The attribution and false equivalence you use for aborted fetuses and dead adults is that they are one and the same, yet their circumstance, status, and even basic ability to feel, think, and breath isn’t on nearly the same level. An adult isn’t able to be killed because they’re relying on medicine, since they’re out of the womb, capable of lacking consent, and are able to communicate. Comparing the two is ludicrously irresponsible to do. Babies cannot be killed outside the womb, because they are newborns, they are self-sustaining and are not reliant upon the parent for basic survival as before.
It is a large combination of factors that makes this less of a problem and much more of a choice, which is why most abortions are done long before the infant is able to feel anything or check off any moral boxes that would suggest it’s not a good idea. Logical consistency between those who are unborn and incapable of feeling and those who are born, is a ridiculous and stupid moral error. By that very logic, you’re not far from saying that someone’s sperm being left out to die is, at least in some form, murder. Using conception as the benchmark is a revolting and disgusting measure to get anything done for the parent’s benefit. Directly afterwards is quite literally just a few cells clumped together, they are not given the treatment of a human until they are actually developed enough to think, comprehend, and feel, as a tiny clump of cells is not able to do. Your comparison is fallacious at best, and your benchmark is straight up draconian.
@Patriot-#1776Constitution5mos5MO
That’s a mouthful of nonsense. You’re addressed absolutely none of my claims, and provided no reasoning why killing these adults is not morally equivalent to murder, you’ve just continued to reason in a vicious circle, assuming the merits of your argument in order to try to prove it’s uprightness…
@9CJ6CB65mos5MO
I am saying a fetus is not the same thing as a human, that’s a zygote with no ability to think, breathe, or feel, not a person on meds. I’m saying your false moral equivalency is ridiculous, and that the parent’s choice trumps that of the assumed wants of something that isn’t even conscious, or even barely developed. That’s why I’m fine with abortions in the earlier stages, but putting the benchmark at conception gives no parents any choice, and by doing so, would basically damn them to being forced to carry the fetus for the whole year because they didn’t see it for 2 weeks.
@Patriot-#1776Constitution5mos5MO
And you've still (surprise!) addressed NONE OF MY CLAIMS, continuing to reason in a vicious circle by claiming it's a "false moral equivalency" without providing ANY logical reason WHY that's the case, and dodging the unanswerable questions I've presented you with! You have used the question begging fallacy, assuming the very position you're arguing for in order to argue for it. Can you offer any evidence under the sun that a "Fetus" is not the sae thing as a human? I don't honestly give a **** if parents are "forced" to carry their… Read more