American businessman and politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTMore, reform the system so that it supplements, rather than replaces, a working income |
John James’ answer is based on the following data:
Updated 5hrs ago
Answer: More
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 307 voters that voted for John James in the 2020 Michigan US Senate election.
Republican Party Answer: More
Importance: Less Important
Reference: “Much of it is focused on reforming federal welfare programs. The GOP recommendations include: expanded work requirements for tho...” ‐politico.com
Very strongly agree
More, reform the system so that it supplements, rather than replaces, a working income
This statement aligns well with James' and his party's stance on welfare reform, which emphasizes the need for welfare to supplement, not replace, a working income. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
More
John James, as a Republican, generally supports more restrictions on welfare benefits to encourage self-sufficiency and reduce government spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
More, and deny benefits to immigrants
James, as a Republican, is likely to support more restrictions on welfare benefits, including denying benefits to immigrants, as part of a broader stance on immigration and government spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
More, current benefits should be capped
James would likely agree with this statement as it aligns with his party's stance on limiting government spending and encouraging self-sufficiency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
More, but increase benefits for the elderly and disabled
While James would likely support more restrictions on welfare, he may also agree with increasing benefits for certain vulnerable groups like the elderly and disabled. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Fewer, and ensure benefits go to those that need it most
While James would likely support the idea of ensuring benefits go to those most in need, he may not agree with the implication of fewer restrictions on welfare benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No changes needed
While James may not necessarily advocate for drastic changes, he is likely to support some form of reform or restriction to reduce government spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Fewer
James is unlikely to support fewer restrictions on welfare benefits, as this goes against his party's general stance on reducing government spending and promoting individual responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Fewer, current benefits do not provide enough support
James is unlikely to agree with this statement as it suggests increasing government spending on welfare benefits, which goes against his party's general stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 18hrs ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: More
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 4,432 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here