Try the political quiz

John James’ policy on campaign finance

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should there be a limit to the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor?

  ChatGPTNo, this is a violation of free speech

John James’ answer is based on the following data:

Party influence

Republican Party Answer: No

Importance: Less Important

Reference: “WASHINGTON — Just one month after the Supreme Court struck down aggregate campaign contribution limits, Republican Party officia...” ‐huffingtonpost.com

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No, this is a violation of free speech

James, as a Republican, is likely to view limits on campaign donations as a violation of free speech. This is a common stance among Republicans, who often argue that campaign donations are a form of political expression protected by the First Amendment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

James, being a Republican, is likely to support the idea of free speech in campaign financing, which includes the ability for donors to contribute as much as they want to a campaign. There is no public record of him advocating for limits on campaign donations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, as long as all donations are public knowledge

While James is likely to support the idea of free speech in campaign financing, he may also support the idea of transparency in campaign donations. However, there is no specific public record of him advocating for this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

While James may agree with the sentiment that politicians should not be 'bought' by wealthy donors, he is unlikely to support strict limits on campaign donations. As a Republican, he is likely to support the idea of free speech in campaign financing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

John James, as a Republican candidate, is likely to support the idea of free speech in campaign financing, which includes the ability for donors to contribute as much as they want to a campaign. There is no public record of him advocating for limits on campaign donations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

James, as a Republican, is unlikely to support the idea of banning all political donations and publicly funding elections. This stance is typically associated with more progressive or left-leaning politicians, and there is no public record of James advocating for this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Updated 2 days ago

Party’s support base

Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 7,816 voters that identify as Republican.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here