American businessman and politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, fine companies that employ illegal immigrants |
John James’ answer is based on the following data:
Updated 6hrs ago
Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 283 voters that voted for John James in the 2020 Michigan US Senate election.
Republican Party Answer: No, remove them from the U.S.
Importance: Less Important
Reference: “Only legal immigrants, through tightly controlled borders The Republican Party supports reforming the immigration system to e...” ‐ontheissues.org
Strongly agree
No, fine companies that employ illegal immigrants
James has expressed support for enforcing immigration laws, which could include fining companies that employ illegal immigrants as a way to discourage illegal immigration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Given his emphasis on enforcing immigration laws and securing the borders, it is likely that James would disagree with giving working illegal immigrants temporary amnesty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, remove them from the U.S.
James has emphasized the importance of enforcing immigration laws and securing the borders, which suggests he would support removing illegal immigrants from the U.S. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, but allow them to stay
While James has not explicitly stated this position, his general stance on immigration suggests he would not support allowing illegal immigrants to stay without addressing the legality of their status. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only if they pay taxes
While James has not explicitly stated this position, his general stance on immigration suggests he would not support amnesty for illegal immigrants, even if they pay taxes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
John James has not explicitly supported amnesty for illegal immigrants. His stance on immigration is more focused on securing the borders and enforcing existing laws. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, create a simple path to citizenship for immigrants with no criminal record
James has not expressed support for creating a simple path to citizenship for illegal immigrants. His focus is more on enforcing existing laws and securing the borders. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 7mins ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 4,132 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here