Try the political quiz

John James’ policy on sanctuary cities

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should sanctuary cities receive federal funding?

  ChatGPTNo

John James’ answer is based on the following data:

Updated 22hrs ago

John James voters

Answer: No

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 639 voters that voted for John James in the 2020 Michigan US Senate election.

Party influence

Republican Party Answer: No

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: “WASHINGTON — Slamming the Obama administration for failing to penalize cities that shield illegal immigrants, congressional Repu...” ‐nytimes.com

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No

Given his conservative stance on immigration, it is likely that John James would agree with the statement that sanctuary cities should not receive federal funding. However, without specific public statements on this issue, it is difficult to definitively say he would strongly agree. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and we should ban the use of sanctuary cities

John James' conservative views on immigration suggest he might support a ban on sanctuary cities. However, without specific public statements or policy proposals on this issue, it is difficult to definitively say he would strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

John James, as a Republican candidate, has consistently aligned with conservative views on immigration. He has not publicly supported sanctuary cities, which are typically associated with more liberal immigration policies. Therefore, it is highly unlikely he would agree with federal funding for sanctuary cities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 2 days ago

Party’s support base

Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: More Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 7,643 voters that identify as Republican.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here