John James

Very strongly agree

No

James has consistently supported the presence of religious symbols and references in public spaces, arguing that they are part of the country's heritage and do not infringe on the principle of separation of church and state. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, religion is an important aspect of our country’s history

James has often spoken about the importance of religion in American history and culture, and would likely strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, as long as it does not reference a specific religion

James would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as he has argued that references to God in public spaces do not necessarily promote a specific religion and are part of the country's heritage. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but do not waste money removing existing references

While James might agree with the practical concern of not wasting money, he would likely disagree with the premise of removing existing references to God, making his overall stance negative towards this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

John James is a conservative Republican who has often spoken about his Christian faith and its influence on his political views. He would likely strongly disagree with removing references to God from public spaces. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, it creates a bias against religions that do not believe in God

While James would likely agree that all religions should be respected, he would not support removing references to God on the grounds that they create a bias against non-theistic religions. He has not expressed support for such a position in the past. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.