Patriot Act blev vedtaget som direkte reaktion på angrebene den 11. september på World Trade Center i New York City og Pentagon i Arlington, Virginia, samt miltbrandangrebene i 2001 med det erklærede mål at styrke den nationale sikkerhed dramatisk. Modstandere af loven har kritiseret dens bestemmelse om ubestemt tilbageholdelse af immigranter; tilladelse til retshåndhævelse til at ransage et hjem eller en virksomhed uden ejerens eller beboerens samtykke eller viden under visse omstændigheder; den udvidede brug af National Security Letters, som g&osl…
Læs mere@N7VVPN3 år3Y
Yes, and I also have no problem with profiling. If someone acts or appears like they may be a threat to the safety of others then they should deal with the consequences.
@LXRPLJ4 år4Y
No and all the post 9/11 horse **** needs to be abolished.
@LQPMZC3 år3Y
Yes, but only in cases of direct threat to American soil
@LQBPKX3 år3Y
Government surveillance should be allowed in times of war, but should not intrude on the privacy of the people.
@G4QHHN3 år3Y
yes but politicians should not be able to access it.
@G4J34C3 år3Y
Find a middle groung on the Patriot Act
@G2WVJ43 år3Y
I dont know enough about it to comment
@G2V6N94 år4Y
Racial,Ethnic, profiling should be allowed when it involves the Security of the USA
and its citizens! Remove the TSA and Homeland Security and focus on beating and destroying those who would do harm to the USA and its citizens. Harsh and swift!
Send everyone who wants to destroy this Country or its citizens a free ride out....never to come back or be killed.