Try the political quiz
+

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

2840 Replies

 @B6GK36V from West Virginia  answered…2mos2MO

It requires more space than solar power, geothermal, and biomass energy and is dangerous to birds. Then again, it is an efficient renewable energy resource. So, maybe keep the ones we already have and don't build any more, or keep some of the ones we already have, but move others out of the path of bird migrations. And if that still kills too many birds, than just stop using wind power altogether.

 @9WKR982 from West Virginia  answered…12mos12MO

No, because of the lack of stability in the industry, the subsidies should be pushed towards nuclear energy.

 @9KX7X9C from West Virginia  answered…2yrs2Y

In my understanding, power companies (among other companies) have received government assistance and incentives in the past which have given them advantage and negated natural completion. Therefore, I am not absolutely opposed to government assisting other forms of energy production.

 @9DSDM6X from West Virginia  answered…2yrs2Y

 @8W8TJ6Z from West Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8SHWBKF from West Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8SF8T7L from West Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @dvdman from West Virginia  answered…5yrs5Y

No, the government should give tax credits and subsidies to the solar power industry instead

 @8LPGKY9 from West Virginia  answered…5yrs5Y

no, wind isn't the best option, we should instead focus on solar, nuclear, and gas in high efficiency generators.

 @8F8M8W2 from West Virginia  answered…5yrs5Y

No, there is no more development nor improvements to be made in regards to wind power. Subsidies are intended to boost research and development in new and emerging fields. Wind is established as it is and does not require any help. It has either proven itself or it has not.

 @9CNF8P8 from West Virginia  answered…2yrs2Y

No, the government should publicize the power industry. Corporations shouldn't control basic necessities.

 @9CF93L9Progressive from West Virginia  answered…2yrs2Y

Only if that means that customers also benefit from those. If companies are basically building them for free, energy generated from that should be used to offset the cost to lower income families, or families with the use of medical devices at home.

 @9B7QFP7 from West Virginia  answered…3yrs3Y

No the government should nationalize all utilities and their means of producing the utilities

 @8RVY686 from West Virginia  answered…5yrs5Y

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...