Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

41842 Replies

  @TruthHurts101 from Washington  answered…2yrs2Y

Reform to a flat tax

“The power to tax involves the power to destroy,” observed Chief Justice John Marshall. “The power to destroy may defeat and render useless the power to create.” He was right – entire civilizations have risen and fallen based on tax rates, and unthinkable economic damage has been wreaked by the wrecking ball called taxation: endless waves of recessions, supply-chain crises, and most notably the Great Depression, the most deadly economic disaster in modern history. This does not apply only in America – the devastating power of taxation has been a constant…  Read more

 @9BYHRVG from Washington  agreed…2yrs2Y

Yes! And to truly understand taxation, one must understand its opposite – free trade. A free trade is an exchange in which all sides involved in a transaction receive some benefit, without force or fraud. For example, say you buy a loaf of bread for five dollars. You obviously value the bread more than you value the five dollars, and the baker obviously values the five dollars more than he values the bread – otherwise he wouldn’t be selling it. Thus, in a free trade, both sides walk away with something they value more than what they traded with. Their standards of living hav…  Read more

 @BillBookkeeperLibertarianfrom Florida  agreed…2yrs2Y

The economy will shrink. Multiply that by millions of transactions every single day and you have something very similar to the Biden economy.

One example that showcases the potential impact of increased taxation on the rich is the case of high-income individuals and businesses leaving high-tax states for low-tax states. For instance, many wealthy individuals and companies have moved from California to Texas due to the lower taxes and more business-friendly environment in Texas. This has led to a decrease in tax revenue for California, and potentially stunted economic growth.

In light of this example, do you think there is a risk that raising taxes on the rich might lead to more individuals and businesses relocating to other countries with lower tax rates, leading to a decrease in domestic investment and job creation?

  @TruthHurts101 from Washington  agreed…2yrs2Y

 @ScholarlyPonderingsLibertarian from Wisconsin  agreed…2yrs2Y

This does not apply only in America – the devastating power of taxation has been a constant throughout human history in countless nations and across endless cultures

A historical example that illustrates the devastating power of taxation can be found in Ancient Rome. As the empire expanded, the government levied heavy taxes on its citizens, particularly on the wealthy, to fund military campaigns and public projects. This led to economic stagnation, reduced incentives for the rich to invest, and ultimately contributed to the decline of the Roman Empire. Do you think there are lessons to be learned from this example that could be applied to modern-day tax policies?

 @9BYHRVG from Washington  commented…2yrs2Y

Absolutely. Human nature is an unchanging constant and as such we must learn from history.

 @EnchantedWandererGreen from Texas  disagreed…2yrs2Y

While it's true that we can learn from history, it's also important to recognize that societies have evolved and developed new ways to address economic issues. For example, the introduction of progressive taxation and social welfare programs in many countries has helped to reduce income inequality and improve the overall quality of life. Instead of raising taxes on all income brackets, perhaps we could focus on addressing tax loopholes and implementing wealth taxes that target the ultra-rich. This would ensure that those who can afford to contribute more do so, while not overburdening the majority of the population. What are your thoughts on this approach, and can you think of any potential drawbacks or alternative solutions?

  @TruthHurts101 from Washington  commented…2yrs2Y

Reform to a flat tax

Well the Progressive Income Tax that you mentioned is extremely stupid and counterproductive. And so are all social welfare programs. AS prize-winning economist Arthur Laffer, father of the Laffer Curve, said -- "if you tax people who work and pay people not to work, do I even need to finish the sentence? You're going to get a lot of people not working!" It's true, and the Progressive Income Tax is even worse because the harder you work, the more successful you are, the more you're punished, and the lazier, poorer, and more entitled you are -- well then you just bribed to vote for the Democrats with FREE MONEY! This isn't rocket science, this is common sense, and common sense, as Ron DeSantis says, "can no longer remain an uncommon virtue."

 @Brandonnoe84Libertarian  from Colorado  answered…8mos8MO

Yes, and lower taxes for the poor, disallow all deductions, increase the sales tax and remove all existing tax loopholes for large corporations.

  @TruthHurts101 from Washington  answered…2yrs2Y

Reform to a flat tax

No, abolish the Income Tax, Capital Gains Tax, Wealth Tax, Gift Tax, Estate Tax, Property Tax, Sales Tax, Inheritance Tax, Gas Tax and all taxes except for tariffs on Communist nations and the Middle East and excise taxes on morally corrosive commodities such as whiskey and nicotine, and in states were it is not banned, marijuana. Taxation is theft and should be kept at an absolute minimum, as should spending -- 99% of what the federal government does isn't even constitutional so theoretically we can afford these major tax breaks. They will also bring the economy from recession to roar virtually overnight and usher in a new era of prosperity.

 @jenkins_johnGreenfrom Missouri  disagreed…2yrs2Y

While I understand the desire to minimize taxation, completely abolishing most taxes could have unintended consequences. For instance, public services such as education, infrastructure, and healthcare rely on tax revenue to function. Without these essential services, many people would face significant challenges in their daily lives. Additionally, progressive taxation systems can help decrease income inequality and promote a more equitable society.

Let's consider the potential impact of abolishing property taxes: this could lead to a decline in funding for local services like public schools, police, and fire departments. How would you propose maintaining these essential services without relying on tax revenue? I'd love to hear your thoughts on this.

  @TruthHurts101 from Washington  corrected…2yrs2Y

Reform to a flat tax

Also, the progressive tax system doesn't produce any "Equity" in society, it rather punishes the working class by annihilating the very people who hire them -- the rich. Thus taxing the rich results necessarily in cuts for living standards for the poor and the working class and will result in more unemployment and less jobs. Also progressive taxation punishes you the harder you work which deincentivizes production and has catastrophic economic consequences.

  @TruthHurts101 from Washington  corrected…2yrs2Y

Reform to a flat tax

Exactly as I said I would -- tariffs on China and excise taxes. Plus the government should not be involved in healthcare, the federal government should not be involved in infrastructure or education, and all education should be privatized. Police and fire departments should be funded by sales taxes which I'm fine with at hyperlocal levels but not higher. In short, because I want to repeal 99 percent of the federal government my plan would work fine.

 @8WR237Q from California  answered…4yrs4Y

No, have everyone pay the amount of taxes required for living in America based on income or taxes on how much well fair receved.

 @9XRR2L9 from New York  answered…11mos11MO

Abolish all loopholes and change rules for when income is realized (i.e. when loans are taken against assets).

 @9X6YZJK from Washington  answered…11mos11MO

No, lower all tax rates, eliminate most deductions, replace most taxation with a consumption tax and only phase in income taxes over $100,000/year/household

 @9WM4J7L from Missouri  answered…11mos11MO

We should tax all equally (flat tax), and remove many of the loopholes used to avoid taxes (i.e. taking on debt to pay for previous debt and never liquidating any assets to pay debtees)

 @9VYMCFK from Minnesota  answered…11mos11MO

The rich pay 90% of all taxes. I’m not rich I’m maybe middle class. I’m getting absolutely shafted on my taxes for working overtime. Thanks tampon Timmy. :)

 @9C4MH8Q  from Minnesota  answered…1yr1Y

No, and abolish all federal taxes on people. Federal funding should be earned through taxes on interstate corporations

 @9N35LF5 from Illinois  answered…1yr1Y

The Government should not be receiving any money a person has earned through work, nor should people be taxed for public schools, loans, or anything that is not directly related to those persons.

 @9MFF8FF from Virginia  answered…1yr1Y

No, they are still going to find a way around it. We should focus our energy on enforcing taxes on the rich.

 @9JNFMWJ from Indiana  answered…2yrs2Y

I’d like to see a flat income tax of 10% with no exceptions for anybody and we get rid of sales tax.

 @9HN5R3Q from Florida  answered…2yrs2Y

If they Claim they are it is a lie and, or usually the people on top have a way around it. If they claim this it will usually just be on upper middle class. Because people who are actually "the rich" usually have a way around it.

 @9FLLXZM from Colorado  answered…2yrs2Y

define rich? which levels are getting most taxed because you cannot define something as rich or poor because that's different in different communities.

 @9FJ6L6W from Tennessee  answered…2yrs2Y

No, the Federal Budget should be audited annually by an independent third party auditor, with the authority to levy fines on lawmaker's personal assets should the budget have a deficit beyond a previously agreed upon threshold.

 @9F7SNL5 from California  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9DMC6FP from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

Taxation is theft. That being said no citizen should be taxed a cent more than 3% of their annual income.

 @9C4MH8Q  from Minnesota  answered…2yrs2Y

No, and abolish all federal taxes on people. 100% of federal funding should come from large corporations.

 @9D4MHTK from North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

the top 1% pa 43% of all taxes in America. I just fail to understand the whole 'rich pay their fair share' then they are paying well above their 'fair' share.

 @9F9YKKQ from Washington  answered…2yrs2Y

  @TruthHurts101 from Washington  answered…2yrs2Y

Reform to a flat tax

No, taxation is theft and all taxes must be abolished as well as 99.5% percent of the government.

 @96LDZKTRepublican from Illinois  answered…3yrs3Y

no, people who make good money shouldnt be forced to give their hard earned money back to the gov't that is there own cash.

 @96JQXK8 from Maryland  answered…3yrs3Y

Everybody should pay taxes, the amount depending on how much income they get

 @96BRK9FConstitution from Arizona  answered…3yrs3Y

Abolish income tax, allow opt-out for Social Security, reduce sales tax

 @95KH9VR from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

 @956TY65 from Colorado  answered…3yrs3Y

 @94BNLDM from North Dakota  answered…3yrs3Y

Get rid of loopholes and have the IRS tell people what they owe with no exceptions

 @93T9FR9 from North Carolina  answered…3yrs3Y

 @932VMN3Independent from Florida  answered…3yrs3Y

 @92L5PD6 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

we should only spend money on first responders police and military/defense

 @92G87KM from Florida  answered…3yrs3Y

They should raise the taxes on those who get corrupted money and get it the wrong way.

 @8ZG4XTD from Connecticut  answered…4yrs4Y

The rich pay their fare share. They are the ones that provide jobs for people. They do pay taxes whoever says they don't they are totally mislead by the main stream media.

 @8Z9KSMT from Colorado  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but they have to make sure the rich can't find loopholes not to pay those taxes because then the middle class ends up paying for everything.

 @8Z7ZHVN from Alabama  answered…4yrs4Y

The rich make up most of who pays taxes. If you raise taxes for the rich in states where the rich pay most of the taxes, those rich people will leave, causing the middle class to make up for those unpaid taxes. Making the middle class pay even more taxes than they already do.

 @8Z33NQS from Arizona  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8X6V22L from Washington  answered…4yrs4Y

Abolish income tax and stop treating corporations as individuals, closing tax loopholes

 @8WYTHG4 from California  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8WFJLP7 from Nebraska  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8VNLXL9 from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8VM4G59 from New Hampshire  answered…4yrs4Y

No, taxes are theft and are used at the discretion of corrupt politicians

 @8TS4WFD from Kentucky  answered…4yrs4Y

Question way to vague using current tax laws and no definition of rich.

 @8SZMZL9 from Iowa  answered…4yrs4Y

The tax for rich people is already high, so raising it any higher would make America have less rich people and it would discourage people from even getting wealthy.

 @8SGDW2KRepublican from California  answered…4yrs4Y

Should be flat tax, if you make over certain % it should be raised little higher according to income

 @8S8BDHS from Florida  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8S6D5XB from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

Flat tax, remove loopholes, remove income tax, potentially increase sales tax

 @8RVYDVW from Tennessee  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8QXLKWVIndependent from West Virginia  answered…5yrs5Y

Tax everyone at a flat rate. By design, those who make more will pay more.

 @8QTV68N from Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

Abolish income and property tax, and replace them with the Negative Income Tax

 @8QSJB8D from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

Eliminate or almost eliminate income tax for low earners, and drastically lower for the highest earners

 @8QGCNJM from Kentucky  answered…5yrs5Y

Should not be tax one a year should come out of weekly check With 5% of your check

 @8Q7C4JN from Oklahoma  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8PH3XHX from South Dakota  answered…5yrs5Y

No and lower all taxes. Also the income tax is unconstitutional and should be abolished

 @8PD79C3 from California  answered…5yrs5Y

Abolish tax income and property tax, but have 0.5% sales tax every year per state. Abolish class system like rich, poor, middle class and homeless, anyone whoever uses those terms again gets fined 15,000 every time for saying such things to demean population people within their own state.

 @8P5LTQZ from Georgia  answered…5yrs5Y

no. the rich are the ones that make the jobs. when you tax them, they let off and dont employ as many people.

 @8J2HJXT from Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

Corporations should pay a minimum tax based on gross profits. Individuals taxed based on adjusted gross income.

 @8FQ4XTN from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

First, stop spending the taxes they do take on pork, useless academic research, unproductive government workers, etc. Get it into the right place before you know how much you really need...

 @8F7QQGVRepublican from Minnesota  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8DD4G7P from Florida  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8CV3Q4Q from Illinois  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8CNW8XDLibertarian from Illinois  answered…5yrs5Y

No, and reform to a Negative Income Tax like the one proposed by Milton Friedman.

 @8CGM57K from Tennessee  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8C9XF5BPeace and Freedom from Ohio  answered…5yrs5Y

Keep it at a percent of your income so your tax in increases and decreases depending how much money you have.

  @TruthHurts101 from Washington  commented…2yrs2Y

Reform to a flat tax

No, this is literally the worst thing the government could do for the economy right now. Biden needs to butt out and let hard workers keep the fruits of their labor, and our economy will quickly recover. Unfortunately, nothing seems to hammer into his moronic, thick skull that this is the truth. He doesn't even appear to know which country he lives in -- after all, as he put it in CONNECTICUT, "God save the Queen, man." (Look it up; it's on recording)

 @9C8QCG3 from Wisconsin  answered…2yrs2Y

It isn't going to work to just keep taxing rich people. Rich people own the big comapnies, so the more they get taxed, the more they raise their prices. So, it ultimatley comes down to the average person paying more.

 @9C4MH8Q from Minnesota  answered…2yrs2Y

 @99VVK7JIndependent from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

if you know the loop holes good for you keep doing it you dont its your fualt

  @Matszy from Illinois  answered…3yrs3Y

One should resort to siding with the Labor movement at times when the capitalist greed of corporations would make it difficult for the average worker to obtain a just wage (thus resorting to raising taxes upon the rich) However, one should side more with capitalism when attempts would be made to abolish private property. Nevertheless, I am split on this particular issue.

 @98NG3YFRepublican from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

 @98GJMZZIndependent from Ohio  commented…3yrs3Y

No they worked hard for their money and I understand Part of it would be beneficial for the economy But there's other ways we can work this out

 @982PDMF from Virginia  answered…3yrs3Y

No becuase it iwll result in higher taxes for the poor and the rich wouldnt suffer one bit.

 @975NQFZ from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Again, if you tax the rich more and more, they are just going to raise their prices on their products to the middle and lower classes. It doesn't work.

 @97297LJ from Illinois  answered…3yrs3Y

Abolish every tax including creative other ways to pretend it's not a tax. Abolish the fed and world bank as well.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...