Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Informed Voters

These active users have achieved an understanding of common concepts and the history regarding the topic of Term Limits

2472 Replies

 Deletedanswered…3mos3MO

YES... with a 12-year max per chamber with a mandatory cooling off period before running for the other.

 @9Y5J4F5Republican from Texas  answered…11mos11MO

No, tenure is valuable, but election cycles should happen frequently so that voters have more control over who is in office

 @9X7CSCRLibertarian from Arizona  answered…11mos11MO

Federal office holders should participate in Social Security and Medicare after 65, rather than making decisions about programs they have no relation to.

  @KindredburkeLibertarian  from Michigan  answered…12mos12MO

No, but their salary and retirement benefits should be equal to the median salary and retirement benefits of their state.

 @some_dudeXDRepublican from Florida  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, add term limits to the House of Representatives and have the Senate once again be appointed by the State legislatures.

 @9S7P3V4Libertarian from California  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but that's FAR from all. For ALL positions in the three branches, there should ALSO be an age cap, strict rules against lobbying, a decrease in their salaries, AND a rule stating that if they are involved in voting and they're absent for 3 or more voting days they should be dismissed (some of them in Oregon deliberately called in sick multiple times so that there wouldn't be enough people present to vote on specific issues when they knew they'd lose).

  @WoodcraftLibertarian  from Arizona  answered…1yr1Y

For the House of Representatives; No, and end Gerrymandering. For the US Senate; No and repeal the 17th Amendment.

 @9LZQ7MQRepublican from Florida  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, members of the House and the Senate should be restricted to 12 years in office. This equates to 6 terms for Congressmen and 2 terms for Senators

 @9KXCNHXLibertarian from California  answered…2yrs2Y

No, instead there should be an age limit. No government official should be allowed to serve past the age of retirement. And decrease salary and benefits.

 @9GS734KRepublican from Minnesota  answered…2yrs2Y

No in general more experience equals better representation and likely more overall influence for their state.
Yes to requiring standardized tests attended by physicians who represent Dems and Republicans to determine the persons ability to do their job. Eg over age 70 should require yearly testing to ensure competency.

 @9D5TYC9Republican from Kansas  answered…2yrs2Y

No, and decrease their salary and require 20 years federal service for retirement benefits

 @8VHZ9WQLibertarian from Maryland  answered…4yrs4Y

 @944V6R2Republican from Washington  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, in order to decrease corruption. Additionally, there should be term limits that dis-allow jumping from political office to political office

 @84ZWD6LLibertarian from Pennsylvania  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, two 6 year terms for Senators and six 2 year terms for the House. Also, implement an age cap, if a member reaches retirement age, their seat is lost

 @93Z87SFLibertarianfrom Guam  answered…3yrs3Y

Да за исключением граждан имеющих особые заслуги

 @93XL57RLibertarian from Oklahoma  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, and they should make 10% less than the median incoming of the constituents of the district for which they represent.

 @93VC3S4Republican from Tennessee  answered…3yrs3Y

No, and decrease their salary and media attention that makes them celebrities

 @93FGVJXLibertarian from Indiana  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes all beureacrats and constitutional appointments should be capped at 55 years of age.

 @84ZWD6LLibertarian from Pennsylvania  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, two 6 year terms for Senators and three 2 year terms for the House. Also, implement an age cap, if a member reaches retirement age, their seat is lost

 @92C5G79Republican from Illinois  answered…3yrs3Y

Term limits are irrelevant when machine politicians are controlled by lobbyists regardless of which influenced individual is elected.

 @92BWFPTLibertarian from Ohio  answered…3yrs3Y

No. But the Senate should go back to being elected by the state legislators, would require repealing and replacing the 17th amendment

 @92BCX2PLibertarian from New Jersey  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8ZJW6GBRepublican from Missouri  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but we should implement mental capacity tests for members of congress

 @8Y5NLTCRepublican from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

No.. but the legislature needs to place term limits onto key leadership positions (committee chair, ranking member, speaker, party leader, president pro tempore). However, allow the legislative bodies to provide a waiver with a supermajority.

 @84ZWD6LLibertarian from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but I support an age limit. Getting money out of politics and banning lobbying will prevent corruption

 @8XTS2B6Republican from North Carolina  answered…4yrs4Y

Add a age limit unless they show proof of phycological examinations and pass them

 @8XDZT2DRepublican from California  answered…4yrs4Y

Two 4-year terms and not allowed to run again until 8 years have passed

 @8WNKYHJRepublican from Michigan  answered…4yrs4Y

No elections should do that, but decrease salary and eliminate their fundraising advantages.

 @8TQPYN3Republicanfrom Maine  answered…4yrs4Y

No, however their salary and retirements benefits should be drastically reduced.

 @8TF8946Libertarian from California  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes and mandate regular jobs in their home state when they're not in session

 @8TDHWGQLibertarian from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, six terms in the house, two terms in the Senate and three terms for the president, and decrease their salaries

 @8TDFXG8Republican from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, also members of congress and government should not be allowed to fill staff roles or lobby after their term completion.

 @8T8GGS6Libertarian from Illinois  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, if not then there should be a certain age where you can't be a representative or a senator due to the norms changing and we need people who aren't as old as they are currently, maybe making the highest age be 70 or even 65.

 @8SVC468Republican from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, five two year terms (10 years total) and three six year terms (18 years total) that way it will increase performance and prevent corruption.

 @8SR8HLWRepublican from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8SKXY2MLibertarian from Oregon  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, set the number of terms for elected positions in the House and Senate and term (years of service) limits for all Heads of Bureaus.

 @8S4Y4CMLibertarian from Georgia  answered…4yrs4Y

I think term limits are an opportunity to stop certain sections of corruption in American politics

 @8RM3S5CRepublican from Kentucky  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, and once they have done their 8 years as president, vice president, senator, mayor, governor, or representative they should NOT be allowed to run anymore.

 @8RJS6QRRepublican from Oklahoma  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but sured serve in both house and the senate and should later resign at the end of there term.

 @8F9Y5HQLibertarian from Minnesota  answered…5yrs5Y

No, as long as the people continue to vote to re-elect a representative or senator, they should be allowed to continue serving. Also, remove term limits on the presidency.

 @8QYL3DZRepublican from Georgia  answered…5yrs5Y

It should be 10 terms in the house and 5 in the senate. States can decide for state legislatures though.

 @8QMFX5JRepublican from Georgia  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but it should be constitutionally amended first before it is put into practice.

 @8Q973B6Republicanfrom Guam  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but it should be an age limit of no older than 80 years of age rather than a term limit.

 @8Q96L39Libertarian from Kentucky  answered…5yrs5Y

Absolutely yes , but for all positions , not just elected officials .
2 terms in any capacity , 12 years maximum lifetime service .
Ban all lobbying .
Pay for elected officials is the mean incone of their district , +25% .
No exemptions from any laws .
No qualified immunity .
401k only . No pensions .
Pay for their own medical or part of a standard commercially available group plan .
No allowances for staff .
They will be assigned personnel from a pool of regular government employees by random draw .
No housing or travel perks except when traveling on official bussines . No free family vacations .

 @maxfern414Republicanfrom Massachusetts  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8PR72VDRepublican from Minnesota  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8P8VQSJRepublican from Colorado  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8P26X7CRepublican from Connecticut  answered…5yrs5Y

No, and, if anything, the term should be increased to 3 years rather than 2. Senators and Representatives end up having to spend half of their term campaigning rather than legislating. Allowing Congress to have two years for work and one for campaigning will allow for a more effective Congress. Semi-related, the 17th Amendment should be repealed and the election of Senators should return to the legislatures and governors of the states. These United States are a federation of states, not a singular, unitary entity. The purpose of the Senate is to represent the interests of the many states before the Federal Government just as ambassadors represent the interests of a country in the United Nations. The House of Representatives is designed to represent the private individual. The Senate was designed to represent the state government.

 @8NZSFFBLibertarianfrom Virgin Islands  answered…5yrs5Y

Regardless, government should be stripped of all its coercitive capabilities and shift into a fully voluntary-based institutionl which can be replicated by anyone else. If an institution wishes to allow its members to be constantly re-elected, then so may it be it, considering it will not be directly damaging to those that disagree with this policy, giving that they can leave at any time;

 @8NRNZ6VRepublican from Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

 @maxfern414Republicanfrom Massachusetts  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, term lengths should be extended and politicians should be prohibited from running for reelection

 @8MRZPV7Libertarian from New Hampshire  answered…5yrs5Y

Congress is a suboptimal system to begin with, and research should be done into replacing it outright.

 @8MKHHFSRepublican from Illinois  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes three four year term. We are asking them to forgo another career path.

 @8M3ZBFWRepublican from Wyoming  answered…5yrs5Y

I think that we should stick to the limitations that the Constitution sets for Congress members.

 @8M6MG57Republican from Alabama  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8KKZJ4XRepublican from Wisconsin  answered…5yrs5Y

No, But decrease salary to that of the average American worker and reduce their retirement benefits

 @8HF5VT8Republican from Kentucky  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, we should have a mandated age of retirement in elected offices of 75 years old and decrease pay and benefits. Our representatives and leaders are supposed to be a representation of what average Americans think, feel, and believe. There should be a bigger push to dissuade Senators and Representatives from lobbying and becoming millionaires from holding an elected position. They are supposed to be American public servants.

 @8H28JKVRepublican from Indiana  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8FG5BTWRepublican from Minnesota  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8F6YLLYLibertarian from Ohio  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, and decrease their salary and retirement benefits to that of the minimum wage/benefits provided by their state. They should NOT be getting any national compensation. Each term limit should be decided by their state.

 @8DVCWKDRepublican from Kentucky  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, once they have done their 8 years as president, vice president, senator, representative, etc they should not be allowed to run anymore.

 @8C7PR8TRepublican from Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

 @99NDNBFLibertarian from Georgia  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, and the 16th amendment should be repealed allowing states legislatures to pick their senators again.

 @98V338SLibertarian from Tennessee  answered…3yrs3Y

No, this decision should be left to the states and local communities, not the federal government

 @98SKPMLRepublican from South Carolina  answered…3yrs3Y

I’m not as in favor of term limits as I am removing corporations donating to congress. Need to get money out of congress

 @8ZMW7CVLibertarian from Michigan  answered…4yrs4Y

No but decrease their salary and retirement and closely monitor their investments and donations which should be subject to FOA.

 @8GNDDS7Republican from Missouri  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8G3ZBH3Republican from Ohio  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, reduce salary and remove retirement benefits altogether. Public office should not receive publicly funded retirement programs.

 @8FLSRG4Libertarian from North Carolina  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes. Cut their salary and benefits as well and no grandfather clause so everyone currently serving must leave off at the end of their limit.

 @8X8G8ZSRepublican from New Jersey  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but I support drastically reducing salaries and benefits of politicians

 @8VSVBN7Republican from Alabama  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8RMC3PNfrom Tennessee  answered…5yrs5Y

No, but Members of the Bundestag elected on party lists should be elected on open lists to allow MdBs to have closer links to their voters.

 @8PWY3X7Republican from Arizona  answered…5yrs5Y

All members of Congress should be limited in terms - say 8 years in House and 12 in the Senate. All members of Congress shoud have to complete 20 ears of service to draw any retirement and medical benefits

 @8KKZJ4XRepublican from Wisconsin  answered…5yrs5Y

No, Bu decrease salary to that of the average American worker and reduce their retirement benefits

 @8PTKH7WRepublican from Georgia  answered…5yrs5Y

No, but we should limit the amount of consecutive terms a person can serve

 @WanderingPaganLibertarian from Oklahoma  answered…5yrs5Y

No, we already have term limits called "elections", but after leaving Congress, their salary stops and retirement benefits can be continued if an individual pays for it on their own. Also, the ability to recall national elected officials needs to be made. Not just state & local governments.

 @8R2RMP3Libertarian from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...