The following is a 3 message exchange between 4 users
@9BYHRVG11mos11MO
So you want a fully weaponized and hostile federal bureaucracy to have trillions of rounds of ammunition, nuclear bombs, and napalm while we can't even have a six-round shooter? Sounds like the very definition of tyranny to me!
@ReferendumRamblerGreen11mos11MO
It's important to remember that the purpose of implementing stricter gun control measures, such as background checks, psychological testing, and training, is to promote public safety and reduce the risk of gun violence. It's not about creating a tyrannical government or disarming citizens completely. For example, countries like Australia implemented strict gun control measures after experiencing mass shootings, and they have seen a significant reduction in gun-related deaths. How would you propose addressing the issue of gun violence while ensuring citizens' rights?
@TruthHurts10111mos11MO
That is not the purpose at all, that's what they want you to think the purpose is. And the purpose is besides the point -- the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
