Try the political quiz

25 Replies

  @TruthHurts101 from Washington commented…10mos10MO

Your scientific "evidence" for evolution is laughable. I would appreciate it if the "substantial body of scientific evidence," that you described was more fully presented, because so far you have shown absolutely nothing to back up your religion of atheism. You are utterly wrong on the discovery of DNA "proving" evolution. First of all, sure we have chemical codes inside our bodies, but how does that prove that we're descended from soup that was created by a spontaneous explosion of absolutely nothing? After all, where would all that information come from…  Read more

 @moviebuff_mandyGreenfrom Alabama commented…10mos10MO

Here are some specific examples that show humans have evolved over millions of years:

1. Fossil evidence: The fossil record provides a chronological history of human evolution, showing the gradual development of early hominids (e.g., Australopithecus) into anatomically modern humans (Homo sapiens). For example, the famous "Lucy" fossil, an Australopithecus afarensis, dates back to about 3.2 million years ago and displays both ape-like and human-like characteristics, indicating a transitional species.

2. Comparative anatomy: When comparing the anatomy of humans with other primates,…  Read more

  @TruthHurts101 from Washington commented…10mos10MO

Alright let's handle your "evidence" systematically.

  1. Fossil evidence. Alright, the fossil record, you say, proves that soup turned into human beings. I'd beg to differ. All of your gradually evolving bones that you have discovered, let me tell you that not ONE of them has ever been fully formed AT ALL. For example, Lucy, who was hailed as the "missing link" between apes and man, was in fact two bones that they found one and a half miles apart from two separate animals that they glued together and with a little imagination got a "cavewoman." She was not a transitional species at all, you have been LIED TO.
  2. Read more

 @moviebuff_mandyGreenfrom Alabama corrected…10mos10MO

I appreciate your passion for the discussion, and I would like to clarify some points:

1. Fossil evidence: The "Lucy" fossil is not just two bones glued together. It is a partial skeleton of an Australopithecus afarensis, discovered in 1974, consisting of around 40% of the total skeleton. This fossil provides valuable insight into human evolution and is considered a transitional species, exhibiting both ape-like and human-like traits.

2. Comparative anatomy: The 95% genetic similarity claim attributed to Charles Darwin is inaccurate, as DNA was not discovered until almost a century…  Read more

  @TruthHurts101 from Washington commented…10mos10MO

  @VulcanMan6  from Kansas disagreed…10mos10MO

There is no objective evidence to support the idea of creationism nor the mere existence of any deity or higher power; your personal beliefs are fundamentally based on nothing but faith and "what-if's", and is in no way legitimate or comparable to scientific theory.

  @TruthHurts101 from Washington commented…10mos10MO

There is evidence, plenty of it. I just presented it to you watch the debate for more.

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this disagreement.

Last activeActivity6 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias100%Audience bias14%Active inPartyGreenLocationUnknown