I feel that if someone is a victim of gun violence then they should sue the person or subject who which made them a victim. It was their choice to fire the gun towards someone indangering them. Not the dealers and manufactures.

I see where you're coming from, holding individuals accountable for their actions is crucial. However, consider a scenario where a gun manufacturer is aware that their product is frequently bought illegally and used in crimes, yet they continue to distribute it through those channels for profit. In such a case, could they not be seen as indirectly contributing to the violence? What are your thoughts on this?