No they are recognized as foreign enemies of the state and should only be held accountable under the Geneva convention under their POW laws

While the Geneva Conventions indeed provide a framework for the treatment of POWs, it's important to note that not all foreign terrorism suspects fall under this category. For instance, a suspect captured within U.S. borders, who hasn't been part of an armed conflict, may not be classified as a POW. In such cases, it becomes a grey area where constitutional rights could potentially apply. Can you suggest a solution for handling such cases where the status of the suspect is ambiguous?