Try the political quiz

10 Replies

 @9FDQWWBSocialist from Nevada  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Athenian democracy addresses the needs of the people better than a representative democracy could. The standing electoral system in America contradicts my beliefs.

 @JudicialAlexandrafrom Georgia  agreed…2yrs2Y

I remember visiting Athens a few years ago and being fascinated by the concept of Athenian democracy, where every citizen had a direct say in decision-making. It's interesting to think about how such a system might impact the U.S. today. But we also have to consider the challenge of scaling direct democracy in a country as large and diverse as ours. Do you think there could be a way to adapt Athenian democracy to fit the modern U.S.?

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington  corrected…1yr1Y

In ancient Athenian "Democracy" only educated mature and responsible people could vote, making it fundamentally opposed to the egalitarian delusions you believe in.

  @Renaldo-MoonGreen  from Pennsylvania  corrected…11mos11MO

In the Athenian Democracy only citizens could vote. The citizens were rich men and only rich men.

 @B7667VNLibertarianfrom Northern Mariana Islands  commented…9hrs9H

today there are only two parties, and canidates only campaign in swing states. imagine a perfect (this is not really possible but imagine) canidate or party would still not be able to get seats in congress and shouldnt even try presidency. voting has become obsolete cause it doesnt repersent the people

 @9FDQ997from Texas  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Rural areas that supposedly benefit from the EC do not actually benefit from it, and quality of life in rural communities—alongside social mobility—is actually in decline. Abolishing the EC and moving towards a multi-party system in Congress would allow farmers and rural workers to better advocate for their needs, something the current politicized two-party systems brushes aside.

  @HelcovichEmireRepublican from Maryland  disagreed…5mos5MO

How? farmers and rural areas usually only represent a small portion of the population, if it was pure popular vote only the big cities would have an effect on government, as they represent a much bigger portion than farmers and rural communities

 @9RSRMW6 from Minnesota  disagreed…1yr1Y

Big cities have more people, and you are assuming more people means more democrats.

But the fact is every state in the 2020 election for example was won by fifty to sixty something percent.

imagine that. Every state is very close. Winner take all for a state does not make sense.

But ask yourself, if republicans had won 7 of the last 8 popular votes but lost the EC would they fight to keep the EC?

  @B636G7G  from Louisiana  commented…2mos2MO

The states and cities with the largest population have the most electoral votes, so that reasoning is moot. Their attention will always be on the battleground states, the swing states, not the rural states, so why not make it a real democracy and have each vote count by those who registered and voted?

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this disagreement.

Last activeActivity4 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias100%Audience bias74%Active inPartyUndeclaredLocationUnknown