Do you support the death penalty?
While it's true that DNA testing isn't 100% accurate, it has significantly improved the reliability…
Take the case of notorious serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer, for instance. He was murdered in prison by a fellow inmate. If such dangerous individuals can't be contained safely even in prison, isn't society obligated to consider additional measures?
Furthermore, the death penalty isn't merely about ease or misguided justice. For the families of victims, it can also provide closure and a sense of justice. Are we to discount their feelings and needs in the name of an absolute opposition to the death penalty? I'd love to hear your counter argument or solution to this particular dilemma.
@9CJ6CB68mos8MO
For criminals like that, we can keep them away from other inmates, under high security. Doesn’t have to be solitary, just not physically close to people.
For families, it is not their choice to decide the fate of another, same as it shouldn’t have been for that murderer. The closure is rarely existent, and either way, they will never have to see them again. Death isn’t on the table, and shouldn’t be because the family decides it.
@RelishJakeDemocrat8mos8MO
The Norwegian prison system might be a good example of this approach. They focus on rehabilitation and humane conditions, even for the most dangerous criminals. Their reoffending rates are among the lowest globally.
On the topic of families and their role in deciding a criminal's fate, it's an ethically complex issue. I see your point about the risk of revenge over justice. There's also the question of how much closure the death penalty truly provides.
What if we were to shift our focus from punitive measures to rehabilitation and restorative justice, even in the most severe cases? Do you believe there's a place for this in our justice system?
