Try the political quiz

4 Replies

  @VulcanMan6  from Kansas commented…7mos7MO

Why can't the standard be unequally applied? Guns are unique from other products because they are literally weapons, by design, so I don't see why the standard can't be applied as such.

 @PitifulR3f0rmfrom New Jersey disagreed…7mos7MO

Guns, much like a car or a knife, are tools. Their use, whether for self-defense, hunting, or sport shooting, depends on the wielder. If a car is used in a hit-and-run, we wouldn't hold the car manufacturer accountable, would we? Similarly, if a knife is used in a stabbing, we wouldn't sue the knife maker. So, why should we treat firearms differently?

But let's turn the conversation to the root problem: illegal use of firearms. What steps do you think we can take to reduce this issue?

  @VulcanMan6  from Kansas disagreed…7mos7MO

Except that guns are not tools, like a car or a knife, guns are weapons, and are explicitly made and sold as such. Weapons, unlike tools, absolutely should be held to different standards, including the manufacturers who literally produce weapons. That should not be an unreasonable concept.

Secondly, if you want to reduce the illegal use of firearms, then we should be implementing strict, nation-wide gun control measures to both reduce and disincentivize gun ownership to begin with.

 @6WP5FSYRepublican from Washington disagreed…6mos6MO

Weapons are not only a type of tool, the primary purpose of guns in civilian hands isn't even killing people. They are mostly used on shooting ranges, for hunting, and other activities that don't involve hurting people at all.

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this disagreement.

Last activeActivity3 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias100%Audience bias98%Active inPartyLibertarianLocationWarrensburg, MO