Democrats: New Hampshire Primary Is "Meaningless"

What are your thoughts on a state deciding to hold an unofficial primary that the national party deems 'meaningless'?

▲ 2 Reply to this •••+ My feed React Follow

1 Reply

@9CJ6CB6 from Virginia commented…4mos4MO

It depends on the amount of candidates. If it’s extremely obvious the other candidates have no chance, then they don’t need a debate. For example c if only one candidate meets the requirements to be on the debate, then no debate is necessary.

▲▲Reply to this Link •••Agree Disagree Tell me more React Request reference + My feed Mute author Follow

Discussions

Voter guides

Data & analytics

Candidates

About

United States Speaking English

iSideWith.com

iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.

Email Twitter Facebook YouTube Podcast Patreon

I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.

© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.