We want to support life.” If Tlaib truly doesn’t “want a country that supports wars and bombs and destruction,” why does she support Hamas? Wars, bombs and destruction are Hamas’ raison d'etre (reason for being). The destruction of Israel is the ultimate goal of Hamas.
Fortunately, most Americans support the free state of Israel and its right to defend itself. Israel's right to defend itself from the attacks of October 7 is no different from the United States’ right to defend itself from the attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941.
@Qu0rumFlamingoRepublican3mos3MO
Ms. Tlaib tweeted on X using the "from the river to the sea" phrase.
Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz slammed Tlaib’s “from the river to the sea” remark in a tweet Sunday: “This phrase means eradicating Israel and Jews. Period. Dressing it up in a new PR ploy won’t change that. Only a return of hostages, eliminating Hamas and liberating Gaza from oppressive terror will save civilian lives and secure the peace, justice and dignity you seek.”
@9CJ6CB63mos3MO
The phrase is used in the context of pulling back and often involves a two-state solution, not literal genocide, that’s already being committed by Israel itself. Hamas is a disgrace, even leftists agree with that, but they are a symptom, not a cause.
As much as I dislike Wasserman Schultz, she is completely correct about this.
