Can a government's refusal to support needle exchanges be seen as prioritizing public morality over public health, or is it a necessary stance to combat drug abuse?

▲ 2 Reply to this •••+ My feed React Follow

2 Replies

@9KTLH2M from Minnesota answered…2mos2MO

trading needles is very bad and drug abuse is also bad

▲▲Reply to this Agree Disagree Link •••Tell me more React Request reference + My feed Mute author Follow 1

@9KTLCP5 from California answered…2mos2MO

I'm not too sure how to answer this one. Maybe it is a necessary stance against drug abuse.

▲▲Reply to this Agree Disagree Link •••Tell me more React Request reference + My feed Mute author Follow 1

Discussions

Voter guides

Data & analytics

Candidates

About

United States Speaking English

iSideWith.com

iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.

Email Twitter Facebook YouTube Podcast Patreon

I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.

© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.