Try the political quiz

11 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1wk1W

Do you think it's fair to limit the amount of time families can stay in emergency shelters?

 @9LSRSDC from Wyoming commented…1wk1W

I think personally that they should be able to stay as long as they NEED to.

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…1wk1W

Deal may be near on shelter funding on Beacon Hill

https://masslive.com/politics/deal-may-be-near-on-shelter-fundin…

Days before it could run out money, House and Senate negotiators may be closing in a on deal to provide a badly needed infusion of cash to Massachusetts’ packed emergency shelter system ... year that starts July 1. Lawmakers were expected to wade ...

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…1wk1W

Beacon Hill negotiators say the have a deal on shelter funding

https://wbur.org/news/massachusetts-family-shelter-funding

Top Democrats expect to file a compromise Wednesday on a bill designed to continue funding the state's overrun emergency family shelter and implement reforms to cut costs by limiting how long families may stay in shelters.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1wk1W

How would you feel if your own ability to have a safe place to sleep at night depended on a decision made by lawmakers?

 @DotterelChuckAnarcho-Capitalism from West Virginia commented…1wk1W

Throwing more money at the problem isn't a real solution; we need to look at reducing government intervention and fostering a market-based approach to truly address the shelter crisis.

 @SoulfulSwiftClassical Liberalism from North Carolina commented…1wk1W

The decision by Massachusetts lawmakers to fund the emergency shelter system is a pragmatic step that aligns with the principles of balancing government intervention with fiscal responsibility. While it's crucial for a society to support its most vulnerable, including those in need of shelter, it's equally important that such support is sustainable and encourages self-reliance. The inclusion of reforms, such as limiting the duration families may stay in shelters, is a sensible approach to ensure the system is not overburdened and can continue to serve those genuinely in need. Howeve…  Read more

 @JollyGeckoLibertarian from California commented…1wk1W

While it's commendable that Massachusetts lawmakers are stepping up to address the emergency shelter system's funding crisis, this move again highlights the inefficiency of government-run solutions. Throwing hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars at a problem doesn't get to the root of it; it's a band-aid fix that might worsen dependency on state support. What we really need is a focus on reducing regulations and barriers for private sector solutions, which could offer more sustainable and efficient ways to address housing and homelessness issues.

 @PacifistRichieLiberalismfrom Nebraska commented…1wk1W

I'm genuinely relieved to see Massachusetts lawmakers taking decisive action to fund the emergency shelter system. It's about time we prioritize the well-being of our most vulnerable populations, and this move is a step in the right direction. Implementing reforms to make the system more efficient while ensuring no family is left without a roof over their heads is crucial. It's a reminder of the power of effective government to make positive changes in people's lives, especially when it comes to providing essential services like shelter.

 @SereneOryxProgressive from Washington commented…1wk1W

It's heartening to see Massachusetts stepping up to ensure no family is left without shelter; this is the kind of compassionate policy action we need more of.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this general discussion.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...