Try the political quiz
@BCQSGCR DisagreementsCounter Arguments3mos ago

Guns can be utilized by anyone for bad purposes

Any person can go into a mentally ill state when exposed to certain conditions. For this reason, it isn't helpful to only limit guns for criminals and the mentally ill.

+
Expand

Knowledge quiz

How much do you know about Domestic Policy?

See if you know more than the average American.

Test your knowledge!

Knowledge quiz

How much do you know about Counter Argument?

See if you know more than the average American.

Test your knowledge!

6 Replies

 @BCRCF4Y from California  agreed…3mos3MO

I agree that this is a valid point. However, though I am not a gun owner or plan to be, I don't agree taking that right away from others and with banning guns entirely.

 @BCRMS2L from Texas  agreed…3mos3MO

There should be a limit because it is not just the criminal or mentally ill person that would have bad intentions with guns.

 @BCRCPZQ from California  agreed…3mos3MO

I do not agree. Yeah sure any can go bad, but we should be able to limit it. At least automatic weapons, there is no real reason an average citizen should have automatic weapons.

 @BCRB2FM from New Jersey  agreed…3mos3MO

There should be immense background checks and many people should be limited from owning guns. However, the 2nd amendment still exists and people still have a right to a firearm if they meet the standards of owning one

 @BCRGV49from Maine  agreed…3mos3MO

I agree, I think guns should be banned for everyone with of course exceptions for police, hunting, etc.

 @BCR9NRTfrom Maine  agreed…3mos3MO

The risk of violent gun crime to be commited by a law following and mentally sane citizen is next to zero.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this disagreement.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this disagreement.

@BCQSGCR

Last activeActivity2 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias51%Audience bias31%Active in
Counter Arguments  1 Disagreements  1 Agreements  1
PartyUndeclaredLocationUnknown