Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

20184 Replies

 @9X7BBQJ from New Hampshire  answered…11mos11MO

Americans should not need health insurance. Healthcare is something that should be available to all Americans at a reasonable cost.

 @9X5F7XZ from New Hampshire  answered…11mos11MO

I appreciate the government attempting to make sure medical needs are affordable, but it does not appear as though the act has been successful.

 @9S4RXWSRepublican from New Hampshire  answered…1yr1Y

In order to have a Universal Health Care System, we have to address the run away costs in our health care system first.

 @9HN2TMK from New Hampshire  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but all citizens should have the option to buy into the healthcare plans offered to state and federal employees at a competitive rate as one of the options.

 @8SLW9JLIndependent from New Hampshire  answered…4yrs4Y

People that need healthcare should have access to it. Cost should not matter when it comes to care and medical involvement in life or death. I do not know much about who or what Obamacare covers, but giving people healthcare that can keep them alive and healthy is important.

 @9BV94CW from New Hampshire  answered…2yrs2Y

 @96QH6K2 from New Hampshire  answered…3yrs3Y

No. We have to address the COST side first before we begin to plan on how to pay for it.

 @96PWHNZ from New Hampshire  answered…3yrs3Y

 @95GRPG6 from New Hampshire  answered…3yrs3Y

I'm very confused about what to say, I'm not a political person; honestly, I don´t pay attention to politics whatsoever, they suck, and there are too many scandals (depending on the person(s) who are running.)

 @94XNQL5 from New Hampshire  answered…3yrs3Y

Private healthcare is a blight on society. If the government need exist at all, it should be responsible for the health of everyone on its soil.

 @albacorewar from New Hampshire  answered…3yrs3Y

No, it's just a tax on people too poor to afford healthcare. Universal healthcare should be a right from birth.

 @92G8ZCR from New Hampshire  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8YSYV49 from New Hampshire  answered…4yrs4Y

yes everyone should have healthcare, but it should cover more and be available to anyone regardless of financial status

 @8YSDH6C from New Hampshire  answered…4yrs4Y

Free healthcare for all. No matter what. Life is important for all skin colors no matter the person.

 @8XZF6PZ from New Hampshire  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8XSK56X from New Hampshire  answered…4yrs4Y

While I support all Americans having access to healthcare, I do not believe the government should have a hand in controlling prices of services.

 @8WRWGFL from New Hampshire  answered…4yrs4Y

No because if we give out healthcare for free, funding for those tools will go down, causing a shortage

 @8TMM7D2Socialist from New Hampshire  answered…4yrs4Y

Obamacare is nothing more than government subsidy to insurance companies and thus a windfall for the for-profit medical industry. It should be replaced with a socialized medical system.

 @8TKMJXN from New Hampshire  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8RJLBWV from New Hampshire  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8RHTNQY from New Hampshire  answered…5yrs5Y

The state governments should have more of a say in how to take care of their own people, rather than the federal government. That would socialize medical treatment while still encouraging competition.

 @8PT4NML from New Hampshire  answered…5yrs5Y

i belive that, that sort of thing should be completly free. but i guess with like where we currently our as a society i do support obama care

 @8PQGL22 from New Hampshire  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8PMDLXK from New Hampshire  answered…5yrs5Y

taking away health care from millions of people which they are not covered is a wrong thing

 @8PH28TD from New Hampshire  answered…5yrs5Y

Have a base system of free healthcare for all citizens but allow citizens to buy private insurance with no restrictions to encourage competition in the insurance market as well as to make up for the inefficiencies of a free healthcare system. After all, some insurances wouldn't cover the costs of very expensive life saving surgeries that a national system could provide. The private care would be to provide quicker health care and overall reduce stress on the national free healthcare.

 @8PFS58Q from New Hampshire  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8N9NVR2 from New Hampshire  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but Pharmaceutical companies should have to bid for providing medical supplies to the government, which will cover all health-related operations, within reason.

 @8N6RD99 from New Hampshire  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8MV383F from New Hampshire  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8LNRWT3 from New Hampshire  answered…5yrs5Y

Depends if the government hs good people and how much they want to control in/what they want to do. (if they want to do bad and unfair things then no

 @8LGR2HHDemocrat from New Hampshire  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but I want to continue having the option to purchase private insurance or have it from my employer.

 @8KY8F75 from New Hampshire  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8KX6WF8Republican from New Hampshire  answered…5yrs5Y

Free universal health care. It shouldn’t cost money to simply stay alive.

 @8KF5SB7 from New Hampshire  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8JKQZSW from New Hampshire  answered…5yrs5Y

Perhaps the government should provide aid to those with preexisting conditions, but private insurance companies should not be required to offer their services to everyone.

 @8H67B8S from New Hampshire  answered…5yrs5Y

There should be a set minimum price for healthcare, but there should also be more options for better healthcare plans that would cost more and options to opt-out of governmental healthcare plan that

 @8FYNB22 from New Hampshire  answered…5yrs5Y

I like the idea of the Obama care project but Donald Trump's Medicaid and medicare are better.

 @8F8ZMR6 from New Hampshire  answered…5yrs5Y

No, public healthcare should be run at the state level with incentives from the Federal government for the state

 @8F2JPZ7 from New Hampshire  answered…5yrs5Y

Open the markets so insurers can compete to reduce costs, but allow the government to forbid companies from overcharging should they become monopolies

 @8CB6Q6W from New Hampshire  answered…5yrs5Y

 @9CKSNJZ from New Hampshire  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9CHMWD3 from New Hampshire  answered…2yrs2Y

No, but repealing it at this point would disproportionately and negatively impact millions of Americans

 @9888FS4Libertarian from New Hampshire  answered…3yrs3Y

 @9835HKW from New Hampshire  answered…3yrs3Y

 @97V6YNMSocialist from New Hampshire  answered…3yrs3Y

All healthcare should be made available to the masses, regardless of whether or not they can afford it.

 @975BS2BRepublican from New Hampshire  answered…3yrs3Y

I feel it could be better but I also feel that Government should not be a part of healthcare.

 @8VMH5NH from New Hampshire  answered…4yrs4Y

A form of health care shouldn't be forced onto some/family that can't afford the forced pay. So no.

 @8LYKGJ3 from New Hampshire  answered…5yrs5Y

No, not in its current condition. Many things need to be changed and rethought

 @8J45RHJ from New Hampshire  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8FL8V2S from New Hampshire  answered…5yrs5Y

No, move to Medicare for All and remove the profit-taking from health care.

 @8F8ZL5Q from New Hampshire  answered…5yrs5Y

Allow local states to create and maintain their own care for low income families

 @8CZBD3KLibertarian from New Hampshire  answered…5yrs5Y

It needs to be replaced. But until there's a better solution, it has to remain intact

 @8WSR8VW from New Hampshire  answered…4yrs4Y

I think this depends on what the government plans to do with healthcare.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...