Try the political quiz

20.5k Replies

@5T2GFKHRepublicanfrom Washington  answered…3wks

If the Father of the unborn child is willing and capable of caring for the child and wants to assume legal custody of child and is a fit parent, I feel he should have an equal say in the decision. There should be rights for Fathers who are able and willing.
I think this may encourage people to be more thoughtful about intimacy. I believe Men should have a say in the decision of the termination of their unborn child.
I also believe in required counseling before and after abortion as it often leads to eventual traumatic disorders and depression.

@9PZS74TDemocrat from Florida disagreed…4wks

There is no evidence showing that the woman has her mental wellness affected from an abortion. Who is going to pay for all of that? The main reason why a woman gets an abortion is because she is financially unstable and cannot afford to care for a child. Sure, it would be nice for a man to have the chance, but the amount of stigma around pregnancy. A abortion is for a woman not a man. A woman's body is more affected by the outcome, and if the man wanted the child then most likely she would not be having an abortion. Plus, how are you suppose to enforce that? Is the clinic suppose to do a hous…  Read more

@Lillyana-Solorza… from Kansas disagreed…3wks

Pro-choice Pro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions Pro-choice, I don’t agree but the government has no right to ban it Pro-choice, but ban after the first three months

I feel he should have an equal say in the decision

The man in the relationship can something but the woman doesn't have to listen. The embryo is growing in her not him. The man has no say so in what the woman does with her body. If she decides she doesn't want to carry the embryo that is her personal choice. You cannot tell a woman what to do with her body, you can suggest something, but don't tell her she needs to do this and that.

@68522HKLibertarianfrom Arizona  answered…1mo

@6B39SH8Republicanfrom California  answered…4 days

End all programs, no abortive procedures period. Lock up all doctors, nurses, staff of any facility that participated in any abortive acts. I want stiff penalties for medical staff and go after any women who have had an abortion and grandfathering it. For each abortion 15 years to life it is premeditated murder not only for the woman also the man that impregnated her!!!!!!!!!!

@9P5KPLGGreen from Florida disagreed…1mo

no. shut up. you are disgusting, you can't control people's bodies.

@9PM6LC6Women’s Equality from Kansas commented…1mo

Pro-choice Pro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions Pro-choice, I don’t agree but the government has no right to ban it Pro-choice, but ban after the first three months

You see you don't understand the concept that it is not your body but it is theirs. Many people say that abortions are wrong but you have no say in what a woman does with her body. Yes, it may not always be the right thing to do but some people just can't afford to have a kid at the time. It doesn't mean that you should just go kill it instead have time to think if that is what you really, and if it is that is your choice. No one gets to have a say in what you do with your body. Say someone was raped and got pregnant, do you really think a woman is going to want to keep a child that came from a man who hurt her. In some cases they do keep the baby. It really is just that woman's choice. Not yours or anybody elses.

@9NZNPK4Democrat from Minnesota commented…1mo

Pro-choice

What??? Are you joking or are you litteraly being serious, you know my Aunt almost died since she almost could not get an abortion since you guys think it’s murder. If you been all abortions then you may be saving babies, but you are not saving women, you do not avocate for them. Also a fifth teen year sentence, that’s a bit extreme, also I know you might not be familiar with the term, but...have you ever heard of rape?

@9Q5G9PJGreen from Colorado disagreed…4 days

Pro-choice

oh my lord please shut up. lets say you were sexually assaulted and ended up pregnant. would you carry and raise that child ???? no. if you had an illness that if you gave birth you would lose your life. would you continue the pregnancy??? not a single should has the right to dictate what a woman does to her body or with her body. if youre not getting the abortion, dont worry about it.

@9QN29CYRepublican from Texas commented…4 days

First of all you asked a question and didn't allow an answer, yes I would continue to raise the child. And you need to get it in your head that at the point of the woman becoming pregnant it is NOT just her child, it may be in her body, but that does not make it just HER child the man in that relationship has equal responsibility in the creation of the child and therefore has an equal say, in what happens to it. And "don't worry about it."? You have to be joking you expect the man in that situation to NOT worry about what happens to the child, or the woman. Any real christian man with at leas…  Read more

@5WYCQ9RLibertarianfrom Maine  answered…1mo

Abortion should be mandatory for anyone with an IQ under 120.

@9PM6LC6Women’s Equality from Kansas commented…1mo

Pro-choice Pro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions Pro-choice, I don’t agree but the government has no right to ban it Pro-choice, but ban after the first three months

Your kidding right? This is the most ridiculous comment I have ever seen. Your IQ has nothing to with abortion. See you people who are Pro-life seem to just throw anything into the situation. A woman who decides to abort the fetes growing inside of her is her personal choice. Her IQ is just another thing that many believe a woman has to have to have a conman sense in life. Some mothers just aren't meant to be. Those who aren't ready to be mothers and keep the baby tend to be the ones who neglect and abuse their children.

@639NZ5NRepublicanfrom Texas  answered…1mo

I do not agree with a helpless human life being ended purely because of any unfortunate circumstance which may have created that life. But I DO NOT agree that my beliefs should be FORCED upon another. Let each make their choices until science can factually determine when life begins.

@5R967Z3Constitutionfrom Florida  answered…1mo

I agree with abortion, only in the first trimester, if the fetus is donated to stem cell research.

@5T5GNJ2Republicanfrom North Carolina  answered…1mo

Pro-life, providing much more sex education, reality education, birth control, awareness of building self esteem and personal boundaries, a movement to de-glamorize promiscuity and permit abortions in first trimester for rape and if mother is in danger by her choice full term...

@5RQPNJRRepublicanfrom Washington  answered…4wks

Pro choice and pro life - sex is inevitable as well as unexpected pregnancy. Birth control should be mandatory for anyone under 18 and abortion due to irresponsible behavior as in not using birth control should be allowed but with penalty that gets more severe for repeat offenders. Drug addicted adult men and women should have mandatory birth control (implant)until drug tested clean for at least 2 years. Men who fail to use birth control share same responsibility and penalty for their contribution toward unwanted pregnancy. Late term abortions absolutely illegal and carries a minimum 18 year prison sentence. No penalty for victims of rape, incest, or medical issues including known birth defects in the fetus.

@9PZS74TDemocrat from Florida commented…4wks

It is already hard enough to prove someone is raped. That would infringe on someone's privacy to have to make them prove that they were raped, or that the pregnancy is a result of incest. Just let woman have an safe abortion instead of them having to sneak around.

@PositiveEnergyPeace and Freedomfrom Guam  commented…4wks

Mandatory birth control for those under 18??? What... You realise most don't lose their virginity until 17/18, & hormones can really mess up some women's mental state... If you are instead including things like condoms etc, than I'm not sure how you would mandate/enforce that rule... But yes, obviously the importance of safe sex should be emphasised...


I'm a 30 year old female (in a sexually active committed relationship), & I have never used birth control pills (nor been pregnant) in my life, & like many women I don't feel comfortable playing with my natural hormones... & I'm …  Read more

@sophlaneProgressive from California answered…5 days

Pro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions

Many people against abortion who claim to be "pro-life" do not understand that abortion is an alternative for birth and not parenthood. You can not agree with the idea of abortion but still agree with the right for the person to choose if they want an abortion or not. It seems like you are really more anti-choice or pro-birth/forced birth than you are pro-life. And if you think they should put it up for adoption, our adoption system is very flawed, so why don't you fix that and then come against me with a stronger argument.

@68KGRZPRepublicanfrom California  answered…3wks

Women should not have babies

@Lillyana-Solorza… from Kansas commented…3wks

Pro-choice Pro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions Pro-choice, I don’t agree but the government has no right to ban it Pro-choice, but ban after the first three months

so how in the hell will the world reproduce dumb *** Your mom gave birth to you. Show some **** ing respect.

@5ZNC7GBDemocratfrom Texas  answered…1mo

On one hand, unborn babies dying is a horrible thing but overpopulation comes into play as well especially on those innocent women who still need to live their lives before having a baby

@5STVMT6Democratfrom Kansas  answered…1mo

Pro-abortion, promote systematic regulated abortion and eugenics

@6CPYC95Republicanfrom Maine  answered…1mo

@692629LLibertarianfrom Pennsylvania  answered…1mo

Abortion is ethically abhorrent if sole intent is to end the life of the fetus. It may be morally permissible if intent is to save the life of the mother, though it is still tragic.

Government may have the right to ban abortion, but this would be very difficult to enforce. Prohibition is rarely an effective tool unless an injured party can report the crime.

@5R9B8YXRepublicanfrom Hawaii  answered…1mo

Pro-abortion. Legal to the end of the fifth trimester (I know...) and compulsory after three kids.

@5X23PZBLibertarianfrom Louisiana  answered…1mo

Give a fathers choice to his right to life with the child except in cases of rape or incest.
( The child should be born and given to the father if the mother does not desire to raise a child with the father - except in a case of substance dependency & abuse, rape, incest, incestuous rape, human trafficked coerced prostitution. Then determine the best determination for resiliency of the child. )

@692BRPLDemocratfrom Illinois  answered…1mo

The term pro-life cannot be used to sufficiently frame the question. Hypothetical speaking is it the mother's life in question?

@5VDWFTRSocialistfrom Utah  answered…4 days

Use the embryo for stem science

@9QN29CYRepublican from Texas disagreed…4 days

You must be high...... Using one of God's perfectly made creations for science?!?!!?!?? God creates things for a purpose then y'all go around murdering something he has made to glorify him.

@65XPGFDGreenfrom Alabama  answered…1mo

Pro-choice, ban after 2 months, cells are donated to stem cell research.

@6CNSYBKDemocratfrom Oklahoma  answered…1mo

@65WZC4RRepublicanfrom Washington  answered…1mo

Pro-Life, but create a system where childless people can adopt and provide loving and stable homes. Adoptive parents pay a fee to cover medical expenses.

@5SX2GYZRepublicanfrom Florida  answered…3wks

Pro choice but I oppose late term abortion. I also feel if birth control were utilized and provided fully, it would cut down significantly

@9Q6VQQ7Progressivefrom Pennsylvania  commented…3wks

Late term abortions are never performed out of convenience. In those cases, the mother obviously wants to be pregnant and carry out her child. They are performed in protection of the mother's life in the case she has an illness that would kill her during labour, or if the child has an illness that would kill it shortly after birth. You're just overall pro-choice. The exception you made was irrelevant.

@5T2986RDemocratfrom Alabama  answered…1mo

The government should fund abortions. End the Hyde Amendment. Abortion is healthcare.

@5SDTDBKConstitutionfrom Virginia  answered…1mo

@5SF2JXPLibertarianfrom New York  answered…1mo

I think both parents should have an equal say whether or not they becom ea parent.

@6NCL82YRepublicanfrom Texas  answered…4 days

I'm personally against it but strongly believe that it's just like the presidential election, if you don't vote you can't say anything. If you disagree with abortion what are you going to do to help those kids who didn't get aborted and are now in foster homes? If you're going to be against it, do something to help. Adopt that baby of the mother you judged for wanting an abortion.

@Lillyana-Solorza… from Kansas agreed…4 days

Pro-choice Pro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions Pro-choice, I don’t agree but the government has no right to ban it Pro-choice, but ban after the first three months

YES PREACH TO THOSE WHO OPPOSE ABORTIONS BUT DO NOTHING TO HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!

@9QN29CYRepublican from Texas commented…4 days

You act like to do anything to oppose people who don't support abortion. You sit around all day and point tiny flaws out when you yourself are creating some of your own.

@5Z9RSLSDemocratfrom Maine  answered…1mo

Pro-voice, looking at the mothers reasoning for why they should have an abortion / medical issues and then deciding if an abortion can be justified

@68JJBD6Republicanfrom New York  answered…1mo

Pro life to an extent. If you decide to have an abortion because you don't want to have a child or you're not ready, well what did you think was going to happen when you had Sex and had a cream shot?! All these ghetto kids knocking up their girls in the hood, they should prob have an abortion because the mother and child is just going to mooch off the system and my paycheck and the kid is prob going to grow up to a perp. I regret having the say that but it's the truth. People need to be better educated, although it's not that hard. You *** inside a girl, she's going to get pregnant.

@6B4FCQ3Constitutionfrom Florida  answered…1mo

Pro-eugenics. Women of European descent with IQs >100 and sound, healthy children should not be allowed to abort their children. I believe rape, incest, and inevitable danger to mother/child are good exceptions to that rule, but those are rare. The underclasses have free access to abortions.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart...