Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9L74W6T from California answered…15hrs15H

Yes, when the threat has been a repeated or known offense and Congress is unable to make a fast decision to benefit the…

 @9L74FFC from North Carolina answered…16hrs16H

Yes, but only in emergencies where quick action is needed. Such authorization shouldn’t last beyond 30 days without cong…

 @9L72LN9 from Louisiana answered…17hrs17H

Maybe, Depending on the situation the President may need to act quickly but they shouldn't have the ability to do it whe…

 @9L6Z2WV from Kentucky answered…18hrs18H

I think that in very certain circumstances that the president should be allowed to authorize military without approval

 @9L6WQF9 from Virginia answered…20hrs20H

Yes, in exigent circumstances and of limited duration. Broader conflicts and engagements should require Congressional ap…

 @9L6W4X7 from Texas answered…20hrs20H

In case of an emergency a president should be able to call the shots if not then it should be passed by congress

 @9L6SYKS from New York answered…22hrs22H

No, but if there is imminent danger and the military must be utilized to protect its citizens, the President should have…

 @9L6SCK9 from New York answered…22hrs22H

I think there should be some congressional approval before entering into any military conflicts. However, it needs to be…