En Juillet 2015, le US parvenus à un accord avec l’Iran pour limiter leur capacité à mettre de l’uranium ou du plutonium des armes. L’Iran a accepté de tourner une centrale nucléaire dans un centre de recherche scientifique et de fermer un de l’autre vers le bas. L’Iran a accepté de laisser l’Agence internationale de l’énergie atomique inspecter ces sites. Les critiques font valoir que l’accord a donné trop de concessions aux Iraniens, y compris une disposition qui leur donne jusqu’…
Lire la suite@2J9F4DG4 ans4Y
This is a very difficult question and I feel that Mr Obama and Mr Kerry have been dealing in fairy dust. Nice story but not believable. I think it was purposeful that Mr Netanyahu referred to Persia during his address before the Congress. There are delusional people at the head of the Iranian regime and with Putin as a neighbor it almost makes you feel nostalgic about the Soviet Union.
@2J27XHB4 ans4Y
We should utilize covert operations to prevent Iran from ever having full nuclear capability. We should increase sanctions to isolate Iran economically, support opposition to the regime within Iran and keep open as a last resort plans to act with military force against Iran's nuclear facilities.
@2J24HZ94 ans4Y
No, unless we are ready to declare war on another country, we have no business deciding what they can or cannot do with their own weapons programs.
@2HZDDVD4 ans4Y
Yes, Iran has no legitimate use for fissionable materials.
All nuclear sites (regardless of banality) should be destroyed, immediately.
No, Iranian, Pakistani, Indian, Chinese, Russian, or student from potentially problematic country shall be permitted to study nuclear science.
@2HYWY634 ans4Y
I am an American who feels that we have taken on the role of the world's parent without being asked most of the time....this, to me, is much the same as having a nosy neighbor who sticks their nose in your business without being asked and very much unwanted...no wonder our military costs are so exorbitant.
@2HWLJPZ4 ans4Y
Yes, but only if the United States is prepared for an all out War in the Middle East. That means total commitment to overthrowing the Iranian Radically Islamist Regime. It is silly to win a battle and lose a war.
@2HTXQZR4 ans4Y
Yes, but only after "reasonable diplomatic options fail" AND, if intelligence provides undeniable evidence they are making weapons
@2HR76NR4 ans4Y
Only as a last resort and as part of international coalition signed pact.
@2HQZG984 ans4Y
No, if there is a diplomatic process in progress then there is no reason to strike
@2HQXRZ94 ans4Y
We should send Navy Seals in to shut down the program
@2HQVXDP4 ans4Y
go after upstream processes and the unranium supply
@2HQKVQ64 ans4Y
No, you're gonna blow a whole country with all that nuclear weapon, leaving a big impact against the citizens of that country. We're only out to fight what is wrong, not create a genocide.
@constantinexii4 ans4Y
Iran cannot be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons, period.
@2HQFVB84 ans4Y
No, and the US should open up diplomatic relations with Iran
@2HQ7B6W4 ans4Y
We won't have to Israel and Saudi Arabia will do it
@2HQ5MJT4 ans4Y
This reality will become increasingly the only option if Iran fails to comply with any treaty's terms, once Iran recoups their frozen billions the dangers to ours warriors will increase, and the chance for success diminishes.
@2HQ4VB7Socialiste4 ans4Y
No, should Iran's nuclear weapons program get out of control a cyber attack would be far more effective, and have no collateral damage.
@2HQ4KC64 ans4Y
Yes, but only in the event that we receive <reliable> intelligence that would lead us to believe that otherwise such nuclear weapons would be used offensively rather than as a defensive deterrent.
@2HQ4JW74 ans4Y
No, because it would cause more tension between the countries and also hurt the environment if a nuclear plant is just destroyed.
@2HQ2VHZ4 ans4Y
Although I support the reduction of Iran's nuclear weapons, airstriking a nuclear facility causes larger environmental, health, political, and social issues.
@2HPY8WJ4 ans4Y
No; cease attacks and sanctions on Iran and provide reparations for crimes committed against the Iranians, which pursuing the crimes and human rights abuses of the Iranian state by legal, reasonable means.
@2HPXSBP4 ans4Y
No, we could gain more enemies by increasing attacks.
@lbgage4 ans4Y
No. But the U.S. should provide nuclear weapons to Israel to provide a deterrent to nuclear weapons being used against Israel.
@2HP725Q4 ans4Y
No, but Iran should be threatened with sure destruction if it detonated a nuclear weapon outside its borders.
@2HP3V244 ans4Y
No, there is no evidence that Iran has nuclear weapons facilities
@2HNVNZ64 ans4Y
Whenever someone tries to win a war before it begins, innocent people get hurt.
@2HNSDGG4 ans4Y
No, unless the U.S. officially declares war on Iran
@2HNTDKY4 ans4Y
Not by airstrike but by ground to reduce fatalities and reduce damage to the country
@2HNNWF44 ans4Y
Yes, if given permission from the UN to go ahead with the bombing
@2HNMTFG4 ans4Y
Only if they are in violation of the terms of the nuclear proliferation agreements, and only if all other options have been exhausted.
@2HNLYJF4 ans4Y
Only if we know they are making weapons. We should not be bombing peaceful nuclear energy plants.
@2HNJ3FN4 ans4Y
No, because sending airstrikes on Iran's nuclear weapons facilities could possibly cause radiation to harm innocent civilians.
@2HN9ZX84 ans4Y
No, but we should not have nuclear capabilities either
@2HN687VRépublicain4 ans4Y
We can always legitimately threaten them. You know, that thing we don't do.
@2HN4M6Y4 ans4Y
Not necessary. The U.S. should not be the only country involved in stemming Iran's rampant hostility, nor ISIS, nor any terrorist group. If Iran lacked the ability and the money to create such facilities, there would not be a need to perform an airstrike. That would require the involvement of multiple countries working in concert.
@2HMFK4R4 ans4Y
Yes, only with substantial evidence and if Iran refuses inspections. I support the idea of Iran having the right to use Nuclear power as an energy source but I am against them(and anyone else) obtaining nuclear weapons. I fear they would be used against Isreal someday causing more chaos across the middle east and possibly starting a World War/Nuclear War.
@2HM25MY4 ans4Y
No, but the US should support other countries in their conduct of airstrikes against Iran's nuclear weapons.
@2HLRW9W4 ans4Y
Certainly, if we can identify where and what they are. Screwing around the way we are will guarantee that some country will take the situation into there own hands.
@2HLP85H4 ans4Y
The Bible tells us to be good stewards of the Earth. Creating a nuclear catastrophe violates that instruction.
@2HLKKGS4 ans4Y
Iran is a rogue nation - isolate them and cut them off - then watch how long the poisonous serpent survives.
