Il 26 giugno 2015 la Corte Suprema degli Stati Uniti ha stabilito che il rifiuto delle licenze matrimoniali viola le clausole del Due Process e dell'Equal Protection del Quattordicesimo Emendamento della Costituzione degli Stati Uniti. La sentenza ha reso legale in tutti i 50 stati degli Stati Uniti il matrimonio tra persone dello stesso sesso.
@96J7QWZSocialista2 anni2Y
si, e bisogna inserirlo nella costituzione americana
@95HXKL72 anni2Y
Si, ma il matrimonio è un istituzione religiosa, quindi si tratta di un istituzione diversa
@8ZN5Z7T2 anni2Y
Spetta al singolo cittadino la scelta non dovrebbe mettersi in mezzo ne lo stato ne la chiesa
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
In termini di parità di diritti e libertà personali, quanto è importante per te che tutte le coppie, indipendentemente dal sesso, abbiano il diritto di sposarsi?
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
Se il matrimonio tra persone dello stesso sesso di un amico o di un familiare non implicasse direttamente la tua vita, ti opporresti e su quali basi?
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
Perché pensi che alcune persone siano profondamente colpite dai diritti matrimoniali di altri che non conoscono personalmente?
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
La legalità di un matrimonio cambia il valore dell’amore e dell’impegno tra due persone?
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
Cosa significa per te l’uguaglianza matrimoniale e perché pensi che sia diventata una questione così cruciale nella società?
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
Che impatto ha la convalida giuridica di qualsiasi relazione d’amore sul tessuto sociale delle nostre comunità?
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
Il governo dovrebbe avere voce in capitolo su chi può sposare chi, o è una libertà personale?
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
Il riconoscimento dell’amore tra due adulti qualsiasi può influenzare la tua vita personale? se é cosi, come?
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
Immagina di trovare il tuo partner perfetto ma le regole della società ti impediscono di sposarti; quali emozioni evoca?
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
Come ti sentiresti se non ti fosse permesso di sposare la persona che ami in base ad una legge?
@2J3ZBRJ4 anni4Y
No form of government should have any involvement in marriage.
@2J3YKT44 anni4Y
The marriage laws should be "equal" to traditional marriages and divorce decrements which include court decisions such as alimony, fornication, etc.
@2J3WQZQ4 anni4Y
Explain to me, other than someone making a buck, why you need a religious ceremony and a law to validate how you feel about someone.
@2J3W9CL4 anni4Y
As long as it's named something else! We call a man a man and a woman a woman so that we know the difference, since marriage is traditionally defined as a man and woman so same sex unions should be defined by a word that describes that! Give them the same rights, benefits, and consequences.
@2J3PGFK4 anni4Y
Who the hell cares. Why don't we talk about the economy instead???
@2J38PTZ4 anni4Y
Yes, but marriages are hetero-normative and perpetuate sexism and homophobia.
@2J37K58Repubblicano4 anni4Y
No, allow civil unions and increase what civil unions mean and rights within civil unions. Marriage by definition is between man and women because there is a natural way to create offspring, however difficult or easy that may be for each individual marriage. Churches should always remain separate from government, which means they are to be allowed to refuse marriages per their choice. They currently do that with traditional man and women marriages when they feel there is not enough preparation among other reasons. So that should be continued, a church is a following of people not just a building to be admired.
@2J2NLJRRepubblicano4 anni4Y
For me marriage has to do with my faith. I think the Government should stay out of marriage and provide family benefits in place of marriage benefits. For someone to be denied access to their loved ones because they are not married is wrong.
@2J2NDXF4 anni4Y
Marriage should be a solely religious ceremony and non-religious people should not be married, but have a civil union and a church should have the right to marry, or deny marriage, to whom they choose.
@2J2BZ5N4 anni4Y
The government has absolutely no business telling anyone who they should or should not marry.
That is legislating someones religious views, and is absolutely contrary to the separation of church and state, as well as an infringement on individual rights.
@2J26NMK4 anni4Y
Yes- but do not force a church to offer license. Patrons are free to choose churches to hold ceremony as they please. Also, condemn the use of artificial insemination for same sex couples. Children have an inherent right to have a father and mother care for them.
@2J26JM64 anni4Y
Yes, it's wrong, and no it's not. It's not right for people to bash it constantly when they say it's a sin in the bible. There are thousands of sins but they continue to only bash this particular one. Then LGBT we get it equal rights, but you can't shove this down other people's throats, the hardcore Christians aren't going to accept unless you show the many standpoints not just have pride days and celebrations. Both sides are wrong, but both are right, so I'm a both
@2HZFBC44 anni4Y
Each state should be able to make their own choice. For example, it is fine if Alabama bans it, while New York makes it legal.
@2HZCG2K4 anni4Y
I do not support it because I am a Christian, but for the same reason I do not and will not keep anyone from having a same sex marriage. It would be wrong for me to hate someone for it. I do not agree with it, however.
@2HZC2CW4 anni4Y
From a governmental stand point the term marriage should be changed to civil union for all couples. The term marriage is a religious invention anyway.
@2HZ3PTV4 anni4Y
Yes, but I still feel a bit uneasy about this as small children may be exposed to public displays affection within the same sex, which I do not feel is natural, but understand, this is something you are born with. However, as the years pass, this will be considered 'normal' and this issue will be a thing of the past.
@2HYY4C64 anni4Y
Marriage should be abolished - replaced with limited term co-habitation contracts
@2HYX3LP4 anni4Y
Yes but call it something else to alleviate the fears of the religious nuts. I couldn't care less what others do in regard to their marriages and it does not threaten mine.
@2HYSG5P4 anni4Y
Marriage was created to safeguard the human race, i.e. protect women and children. In the U.S. and other parts of the world it is used to control permissions and freedoms, i.e. taxes, property, and medical decisions. Therefore, marriage should not be religious or based on sex. It is a legal status therefore it should be based upon two people who decide they want to enter a legal relationship.
@2HYKBJH4 anni4Y
Yes, it's not my right to say if someone could marry someone else that they love, regardless of sexual orientation.
@2HYC6C84 anni4Y
Don't care, just don't be all up in my face about it and broadcast it everywhere. Just do what you want and go about your business.
@NB23F54 anni4Y
They may get married but only receive "marriage" benefits if they have children.
@N946VJ4 anni4Y
I couldn't care who marries whom, or what. All I ask is that if a gay couple get married, that they call it gay married to substantiate the difference. That way, if I say I am married, the person asking knows I am married to a woman. If I said I was gay married, they would know my partner was a male. That is all I would ask for. Fair enough.
@N828FM4 anni4Y
Civil Unions for same-sex couples and heterosexual couples. Marriage is a religious sacrament. Separation of Church and State is well documented. The State should not be allowed to name one of its numerous licenses after a Christian sacrament. The Church is allowed to dictate who it will and will not provide a marriage ceremony. This should solve the whole thing. It's semantics.
@N4GVS74 anni4Y
It shouldn't be called "marriage" because marriage from the very beginning was between a man and a woman. They should call it something else and they should be allowed to be together.
@N2P4J54 anni4Y
For a workers party. For a workers government. For the right of gay, lesbian, bisexual, & transgender marriage - and divorce! For full democratic rights for GBLT people. Defend the 1st Amendment Jeffersonian-Madisonian separation of religion & state, including 1st & 14th Amendment equality before the law for GBLT people. For the 2nd Amendment right of armed self-defense by GBLT people against bigoted terrorism. For the arming of GBLT people in self-defense against bigoted terrorism.
@MSJG3Z4 anni4Y
Individual decision, does not need a master to grant permission.
@MB9WMR4 anni4Y
Call it a partnershjp, and give them rights - but DON'T call it marriage!
@MB7LK44 anni4Y
It's not the role of government to define the term "marriage" for the people and their religions. There is no valid reason for the state to be involved in, or to regulate, adult consensual relationships that don't involve procreation. But it should have nothing to do with "banning" or refusing to allow anyone to define their relationship and the term they choose for it, however they, and their religion, defines it.
@M9QS3W4 anni4Y
Clergy should not act as agents of the state in witnessing marriages. All unions gay and straight should be civil. If the couple wishes to have a religious ceremony subsequently then they can do so according to the rules of their house of worship.
@M9QBLM4 anni4Y
Marriage should be seperated from the ritual, churches should not be required to marry everyone but, I believe it is financially a better decision to be inclusive of multiple no traditional types of relationships for marriages
@M9LP8R4 anni4Y
I think that all marriages should be called marriages, but the churches could have sacremental marriages.
@M98THR4 anni4Y
yes, Government has no business in this matter
@M87S2T4 anni4Y
I don't need the state to sanction marriage. It's a religious institution.
@M84PP84 anni4Y
Government should not be involved with this.
@M65JNB4 anni4Y
Why is the government allowed to define relationships?
@M5ZSRY4 anni4Y
Let the individuals, families, and churches to decide. Not the Federal government.
L’attività storica degli utenti che interagiscono con questo question .
Caricamento dei dati...
Caricamento grafico...
Caricamento dei temi politici degli utenti coinvolti in questa discussione
Caricamento dei dati...