Nuclear power is the use of nuclear reactions that release energy to generate heat, which most frequently is then used in steam turbines to produce electricity in a nuclear power station. In the U.S. 100 nuclear reactors provide 20% of the country's energy. Proponents argue that nuclear energy is now safe and emits much less carbon emissions than coal plants. Opponents argue that recent nuclear disasters in Japan prove that nuclear power is far from safe.
68% Yes |
32% No |
55% Yes |
21% No |
9% Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives |
11% No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal |
2% Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy |
|
1% Yes, but with public subsidy |
|
1% Yes, and nationalize the industry |
See how support for each position on “Nuclear Energy” has changed over time for 7.6m America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Nuclear Energy” has changed over time for 7.6m America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@936M36V2yrs2Y
Research needs to be done into fusion and funded by the government
@92ST6V92yrs2Y
The government should fund research into fusion
@8N7PX753yrs3Y
I need to conduct further research
@93B875H2yrs2Y
Research needs to be funded into fusion
@92SNNWK2yrs2Y
We should fund research into fusion
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Nuclear Energy” news articles, updated frequently.
@ISIDEWITH2wks2W
In a series of recent updates, Governor Andy Beshear of Kentucky has taken decisive action on a variety of legislative measures, underscoring his administration's priorities and policy direction. Among the notable decisions, Governor Beshear has signed into law measures that will release $71 million in capital construction funds for improvements at Kentucky State Parks, a move that underscores the state's commitment to enhancing its natural and recreational resources. This funding, approved in the last budget, marks a significant investment in the state's park infrastructure, aiming to boost tourism and provide better facilities for residents and visitors alike.However, not all proposed legislation received the governor's approval. Governor Beshear vetoed several bills, including a change of venue law and the establishment of a Nuclear Energy Development Authority. These vetoes reflect the governor's stance on judicial processes and energy policy, highlighting a cautious approach towards nuclear energy development and changes in legal procedures that could affect the fairness of trials.The governor's actions come amid a busy period for the state, which has recently been affected by severe weather. In his updates, Governor Beshear also touched upon economic development initiatives and the upcoming total solar eclipse, indicating a broad range of issues on the state's agenda. The governor's decisions on recent bills, particularly his vetoes, have sparked discussions on the future of energy policy and judicial reforms in Kentucky.These legislative actions and vetoes by Governor Beshear are critical for shaping Kentucky's policy landscape. As the state navigates challenges such as severe weather and seeks to bolster its economy, the governor's leadership and decisions will continue to play a pivotal role in determining Kentucky's path forward.As Kentucky moves ahead, the implications of these legislative decisions will be closely watched by policymakers, industry stakeholders, and the public. The balance between economic development, environmental stewardship, and judicial fairness remains a key focus for Governor Beshear's administration, reflecting the complex interplay of issues facing the state today.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
