In March 2014, Russian soldiers entered Ukraine and took control of several strategic positions within the country. The following month the Ukrainian parliament declared that its territory was officially being occupied by Russia. The invasion was immediately condemned by the U.S. and other U.N. member states as a direct invasion of a sovereign country and an act of war. In response NATO countries began military exercises in the region including the addition of 600 U.S. ground troops in Poland. Opponents of military action argue that the conflict the U.S. should not get involved in regional…
Read more35% Yes |
65% No |
29% Yes |
49% No |
4% Yes, we should provide them weapons to defend themselves but not send our troops |
8% No, we should pursue diplomatic options instead |
2% Yes, the Russian invasion of the Ukraine threatens the balance of power in the region |
7% No, we should stay out of conflicts that do not directly threaten us |
See how support for each position on “Ukraine” has changed over time for 148k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Ukraine” has changed over time for 148k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@57697SG3yrs3Y
Ukraine needs to sort itself out, first. Once they have a legitimate government in place, then we can help them. As it stands, the only reason we are there is to protect corporate interests, particularly those of members of the current Presidential administration.
@575Z7FZ3yrs3Y
Engage in diplomatic talks to ease tensions and rehabilitate the region so that all stake holders walk away with something to gain. It also ensures that the people in this region are saved from more bloodshed, have their own voices heard and can move on.
@5FJCR9Z3yrs3Y
Yes- we should outlaw major war by declaring "The next country to invade another we will turn to glass within 24 hours of their aggression. As the leading superpower we will not tolerate war- and any organization acting on behalf of a country or claiming to- will reduce that country's population to zero. Again- we WILL NOT tolerate war any longer. The age of peace has finally come to the earth. Be productive, and TRADE. IF you decide to fight, we will kill you. Simple decision.
@5759BST3yrs3Y
Yes, but only with supplies and equipment.
@5H4JKB23yrs3Y
No, and the US needs to honor the agreements made between Gorbechev and Reagan and stop agitating Russia for geopolitical reasons.
@amadios3yrs3Y
The UN Security Counsel should decide if the use of force is appropriate
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Ukraine” news articles, updated frequently.
@ISIDEWITH7hrs7H
As the United States gears up for its upcoming presidential election, Microsoft has sounded the alarm on a concerning development: Russian influence operations targeting the electoral process have begun to intensify. According to recent findings by the tech giant, Russia-linked accounts have been actively disseminating divisive content aimed at U.S. audiences. This includes criticism of American support for Ukraine amidst its ongoing conflict with Russia, highlighting a strategic attempt to sow discord and influence public opinion.Microsoft's investigation reveals that these influence campaigns have gradually increased over the past 45 days, marking a significant uptick in activity aimed at swaying the outcome of the U.S. election. Although the pace of these operations is reportedly slower than in previous election cycles, the intent remains clear: to undermine confidence in the democratic process and weaken the United States' position on the global stage.Analysts have identified several groups affiliated with the Russian government as being behind these efforts. Their objectives are multifaceted, but a key goal appears to be reducing U.S. support for Ukraine, thereby exacerbating domestic divisions within the United States. This strategy not only aims to influence the election outcome but also to erode the unity and resolve of American society and its allies.The European Union is also taking note of these developments, with EU leaders discussing potential responses to Russian meddling. There are calls within the bloc for new sanctions targeting Russia's 'malign activities,' underscoring the international concern over Russia's attempts to interfere in democratic processes not only in the United States but also within the EU.As the world watches closely, the revelations from Microsoft serve as a stark reminder of the ongoing challenges facing democracies in the digital age. With influence operations becoming increasingly sophisticated, the need for vigilance and resilience against such threats has never been more critical. As the U.S. election draws nearer, all eyes will be on how the nation and its allies respond to these attempts at interference, with the integrity of democratic institutions hanging in the balance.
@ISIDEWITH7hrs7H
The aid to support Ukraine totals about $61 billion. Republicans on the House Appropriations Committee said that more than a third of that amount would be dedicated to replenishing weapons and ammunition systems for the U.S. military.Aid in the legislation to support Israel and provide humanitarian relief to citizens of Gaza comes to more than $26 billion. The amount of money dedicated to replenishing Israel’s missile defense systems totals about $4 billion in the House and Senate bills. An additional $2.4 billion for current U.S. military operations in the regions is also the same in both bills.The investments to counter China and ensure a strong deterrence in the region come to about $8 billion. The overall amount of money and the investments in the two bills is about the same with a quarter of funds used to replenish weapons and ammunition systems that had been provided to Taiwan.
@ISIDEWITH23hrs23H
Russia's military death toll in Ukraine has now passed the 50,000 mark, the BBC can confirm.In the second 12 months on the front line - as Moscow pushed its so-called meat grinder strategy - we found the body count was nearly 25% higher than in the first year.BBC Russian, independent media group Mediazona and volunteers have been counting deaths since February 2022.New graves in cemeteries helped provide the names of many soldiers.Our teams also combed through open-source information from official reports, newspapers and social media.More than 27,300 Russian soldiers died in the second year of combat - according to our findings - a reflection of how territorial gains have come at a huge human cost.Russia has declined to comment.The term meat grinder has been used to describe the way Moscow sends waves of soldiers forward relentlessly to try to wear down Ukrainian forces and expose their locations to Russian artillery.The overall death toll - of more than 50,000 - is eight times higher than the only official public acknowledgement of fatality numbers ever given by Moscow in September 2022.The actual number of Russian deaths is likely to be much higher.Our analysis does not include the deaths of militia in Russian-occupied Donetsk and Luhansk - in eastern Ukraine. If they were added, the death toll on the Russian side would be even higher.Ukraine, meanwhile, rarely comments on the scale of its battlefield fatalities. In February, President Volodymyr Zelensky said 31,000 Ukrainian soldiers had been killed - but estimates, based on US intelligence, suggest greater losses.Former prisoners have also described the high price paid by their comrades."If you sign up now, be ready to die, mate," says Sergei, in an online forum for Storm fighters and their relatives, where information is shared.He claims to be a former inmate who has been fighting in a Storm unit since October.Another forum member says he joined a Storm platoon of 100 soldiers five months ago and is now one of just 38 still alive."Every combat mission is like being born again."
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
@ISIDEWITH3wks3W
In a series of developments that have stirred the political landscape, former President Donald Trump has publicly endorsed the presidential bid of independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., describing it as 'great for MAGA.' Trump's remarks came after Kennedy announced his vice-presidential pick, further intensifying the political discourse. Trump, in his characteristic style, took to social media to express his views, labeling Kennedy as the 'most radical left' candidate in the race and highlighting the liberal credentials of Kennedy's running mate, Nicole Shanahan. Despite his criticism of their political stance, Trump views Kennedy's candidacy as beneficial for his MAGA movement, suggesting it could potentially divide the Democratic vote.Kennedy, a figure who has long been associated with controversial views, particularly on the rule of law and established science, has drawn criticism and concern from various quarters. His decision to run for president and the subsequent endorsement by Trump has sparked a flurry of reactions, with some seeing it as a strategic move that could impact the Democratic Party's chances in the upcoming elections. Allies of President Joe Biden have expressed alarm over Kennedy's bid, fearing it could siphon off crucial votes from the left, thereby posing a significant threat to Biden's reelection efforts.The political dynamics surrounding Kennedy's candidacy and Trump's endorsement underscore the complex and often unpredictable nature of American politics. As the race for the presidency heats up, the strategies employed by candidates and their supporters are coming under increased scrutiny. The potential impact of Kennedy's run on the Democratic vote is a topic of much speculation, with analysts and political observers closely monitoring the situation.Trump's support for Kennedy, despite their ideological differences, highlights the former president's tactical approach to politics. By endorsing a candidate who could potentially weaken his opponents, Trump is playing a strategic game, aiming to maximize his own chances of success. This move has not only added a new dimension to the political landscape but has also raised questions about the future direction of both the Republican and Democratic parties.As the United States gears up for another presidential election, the emergence of candidates like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and the reactions they provoke from figures like Donald Trump are indicative of the shifting sands of American politics. With the electorate increasingly polarized, the outcome of the election remains uncertain, and the strategies adopted by candidates will be crucial in determining the path forward.
@ISIDEWITH11yrs11Y