More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Republicans
Last answered 1 hour ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Republicans.
No, limiting drug prices would also limit the investment in research and development into new life-saving drugs
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Sep 6, 2016. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
More stances on this issue
The government would not have to regulate any drug price if the insurance industry did not exist. Drug companies would be bankrupt if anyone had to pay OOP for drugs. 3 years ago from a Republican in Roscommon, MI
Only to a certain degree, the company has to make a profit to pay it's bills too but shouldn't jeopardize life for the sake of stock holders. 3 years ago from a Republican in Atlanta, GA
Yes, but only life-saving drugs and a fair profit margin slightly higher than typical for industry should be targeted to encourage further investment in life-saving drugs. 3 years ago from a Republican in San Juan Capistrano, CA
It is not good to have government regulate private business but put a cap on profits. a percentage above cost and kept affordable. 3 years ago from a Republican in Los Angeles, CA
Only if they also enforce that research be published according to the difference in rates of increase in pharmaceutical prices and the inflation rate nationally. 3 years ago from a Republican in Marysville, WA