More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Household (single-father) voters
Last answered 3 hours ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Household (single-father) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Oct 17, 2013. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Household data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
6 years ago by businessweek.com
6 years ago by express.co.uk
6 years ago by net.au
6 years ago by hindustantimes.com
6 years ago by theguardian.com
6 years ago by bbc.co.uk
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
They are the 1% that still ofder pensions, all others have to rely on 401k savings and other plans, it should be equal, becuase they are working in government they should not be more special than others working as hard if not harder than them. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Union City, NJ
I think the government workers getting a pension and nobody else getting a pension is not very fair. Why do they get special treatment when the working citizens aren't even going to see all the money they put into Social Security because Congress has... 6 years ago from a Republican in Denton, TX
If we take workers pay and invest it in the pension fund, we cannot reduce their payments, it is money they earned. Wisconsin's Governor looted his state employees pension and he should go to prison for that. It is NOT a hand-out, it is an... 6 years ago from a Democrat in Florence, SC
All pension funds need to be funded on a quarterly basis into a separate fund that Companies, Unions nor Governments can touch. Pensions need some better protections for the workers. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Cleveland, OH
Federal, state, local government, INCLUDING CONGRESS, SENATE, PRESIDENT etc should all be on the exact same plan as the rest of us. NO EXCEPTIONS. If a 401k is good for the goose it is good for the gander. 6 years ago from a Republican in Granbury, TX
Yes, but minimizing the impact on those who are currently dependent on their pension. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Hayward, CA
Teachers are state workers who deserve their pension after the give their 25 to 30 years to their community. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Minneapolis, MN
Pensions may need reworking, but the cookie cutter talking point solutions are not adressing the issue. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Aberdeen, MD
Yes, it should be replaced with social security. Government workers should not have benefits that exceed those of common people. 6 years ago from a Republican in Houston, TX
Yes, but it depends on the plan. 6 years ago from a Republican in New Orleans, LA
No, current pensions play an important role in the well being of our senior citizens, and the public sector would be well-advised to take a cue from them. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Houston, TX
Yes, but not necessarily reduced. Leave it up to the federal, state, and local governments to decide for themselves. 6 years ago from a Republican in Lovejoy, MO
YES, THE POST OFFICE IS BEING UNDERMINED BY BEING FORCED TO OVERSPEND INTO THEIR PENSIONS. EVERYTHING ELSE IS PROBABLY FINE. 6 years ago from a Green in National City, CA
Traditional government pension plans are not really the problem. The abandonment of the defined benefit by the private sector and now some government agencies is the major problem regarding retirement. The 401Ks are only good if the stock market does... 6 years ago from a Democrat in Vista, CA
Yes, in any case in which a pension system loses money for its participants for more than two consecutive years. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Cleveland, OH
Pensions should be reformed, but should not be eliminated. It would be wise to study those pension plans that work most efficiently and try to duplicate what they are doing. Out of control spending on pensions is not good for the general welfare. Failure... 6 years ago from a Democrat in Delta, PA
They should participate in Social Security with the funds previously set aside for pensions. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Salt Lake City, UT
Reform pension plans to bring them to full funding over a period of less than ten years by a combination of increasing the employee contribution portion and requiring that no pension may be drawn until age 65 and that no government employee be allowed to... 6 years ago from a Republican in Offutt A F B, NE