More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Household (single-father) voters
Last answered 2 hours ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Household (single-father) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Oct 21, 2013. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Household data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
5 years ago by motherjones.com
5 years ago by washingtonpost.com
5 years ago by thinkprogress.org
5 years ago by billmoyers.com
6 years ago by washingtonpost.com
6 years ago by occupydemocrats.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
Yes . No more gerrymandering for unfair advantage by party in power during redistributing Andy it should be done by a multi - member, proportionally selected for redistricting. 6 years ago from a Republican in Spring Valley, NY
If there were a way to absolutely confirm that each member of a non-partisan commission were open to all possibilities then yes. Maybe, some type of voir dire approach would work. 6 years ago from a Republican in Meridian, ID
Gerrymandering is wrong and takes away the true point of the county or distructs individuality. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Beaverton, OR
There is no way to keep the panel free Except by Random, lets say Jury duty people of our peers being randomly selected. and the job could only ever be done ONCE. 6 years ago from a Republican in La Mesa, CA
No, because then we'll be so busy arguing over non-partisan status of commissioners that they'll never even get to the task of redrawing boundaries. 6 years ago from a Republican in Woodbridge, VA
No we should be voting for all Congress members in the same way we do for Senators. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Cleveland, OH
Redistricting should be completed by a jury of 12 voters from each attached at multi -sided township areas till the required populace is achieved to qualify for representation. 6 years ago from a Green in Carpentersville, IL
Allow redrawing district line to balance population in districts, not to concentrate political affiliations. 6 years ago from a Republican in Livingston, TX
Let the states decide for themselves whether to continue the current system, switch to a commission, or establish another way to elect a state's Congressional representation. 6 years ago from a Republican in Beech Grove, IN
No, Go back to the constitution convention and draw lines as originally equated. Straight lines through the state. 6 years ago from a Republican in Las Vegas, NV
We are in an age where we won't need Representatives, we have the internet thus the ability to vote ourselves. Those who do not have access can go to a library or online voting booths could be constructed. Our "representatives" are no... 6 years ago from a Democrat in Wadesboro, NC
We should follow the Constitution and expand the house. No mere act of congress should be able to over ride the Constitution, and following it would give us some 4,000 house reps. 6 years ago from a Republican in Des Moines, IA
Yes absolutely, and the strict census-based timeframe on redistricing should be routinely and without exception enforce. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Houston, TX
There should be increased representation in Congress. A district should have a population of at least 300,000 residents but no more than 500,000 residents and should be reasonably geographically determined and ignore demographics. 6 years ago from a Republican in Lansing, MI
No because there is no such thing as unbiased opinions. But a better alternative could be development. If you had term limits a true servant to the public could suggest it and have a chance to get it passed. 6 years ago from a Republican in Raleigh, NC
Abolish the concept of political parties through legislation so that government officials will think in the interest of the people, rather than their party. 6 years ago from a Green in Tulare, CA
Congressional Districts should be drawn only along geographic lines, not according to the whims and desires of political party members. 6 years ago from a Republican in Madison, TN
There should be a moratorium/time limit - perhaps something like redistricting can only occur even ten years - off cycle with the elections. 6 years ago from a Republican in Capitol Heights, MD
Districts should be drawn ona strict geographical basis as close to aquare in shape as possible, dependent on disivision of the state's population only. 6 years ago from a Republican in Wolcott, CT
No person should do it. There are open source programs that can do it in a very simple, non-gerrymandered way. Only take eligible voting population and compact geographical district into consideration. Do not use race, incumbency, or political party... 6 years ago from a Green in Raleigh, NC
Yes, develop computer algorithms to divide the populations of districts evenly. Gerrymandering increases political polarization, it is detrimental. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Bowling Green, KY
We should use the shortest split line method to draw districts. It is the most impartial because it's a simple algorithm of equally splitting a population with the shortest lines possible. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Milwaukee, WI
Should be based on a mathematical algorithm that takes population and location into account. 6 years ago from a Republican in Westminster, CO
Leave it to the states. 6 years ago from a Republican in Stanwood, WA