A 2017 College Board study estimated that the cost of college has increased 100% since 2001. The St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank estimates that U.S. college tuition debt has increased from $480 billion in 2006 to $1.5 trillion in 2018. Several 2020 Democratic Presidential Primary candidates have argued that the cost of college is out of control and that the government should pay for tuition. Opponents argue that the government cant afford it and point to estimates from the Committee for a Responsible Federal budget that estimate programs would cost the government $80 billion a year.
45% Yes |
55% No |
39% Yes |
38% No |
7% Yes, but only for partial tuition |
9% No, but provide lower interest rates for student loans |
8% No, but provide more scholarship opportunities for low-income students |
See how support for each position on “Free College for All” has changed over time for 2.8m America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Free College for All” has changed over time for 2.8m America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@8LXMDF53yrs3Y
I think they should help the people who need it but not for everyone
@94Z37B42yrs2Y
No, but abolish interest rates for student loans.
@8G5FNF44yrs4Y
No, but they should offer more scholarships and grants for all students of all types of income.
@8KWVHJ83yrs3Y
Yes, but provide lower interest rates for student loans.
@8DB5PWQ4yrs4Y
Yes, but only for state schools and community colleges
@8DNRMD54yrs4Y
No, college should just be cheaper
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Free College for All” news articles, updated frequently.
@MercifulLollies2mos2MO
ACA-7 passed the state Assembly in September and sits before the Democrat-controlled Senate. If approved there, it would be put before voters this November.The bill would effectively allow the governor to circumvent the state’s longstanding ban on racial preferences first passed by a majority…
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry.…
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
Countries that have mandatory retirements for politicians include Argentina (age 75), Brazil (75 for judges and prosecutors), Mexico (70 for judges and prosecutors) and Singapore (75 for members of parliament.)