More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Associate's Degree voters
Last answered 20 minutes ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Associate's Degree voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Jan 5, 2014. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Education data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
- District of Columbia
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- West Virginia
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
5 years ago by theguardian.com
5 years ago by csmonitor.com
6 years ago by theguardian.com
6 years ago by co.nz
6 years ago by theguardian.com
6 years ago by cbc.ca
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
Yes, he should be protected under the Whistleblower Protection Act
and they should investigate the CIA and NSA directors instead. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Coronado, CA
Yes, he should be protected under the whistle-blowers act, investigate the CIA and NSA and prosecute the directors of these agencies for their crimes. 6 years ago from a Green in Portland, OR
This is complex. I sympathize with Snowden and am grateful that the information became public (although I wish it had been less globally public), but there needs to be a safe way for whistleblowing within the system. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Enfield, CT
I do not have a solid basis to provide an answer for that. 6 years ago from a Democrat in La Jolla, CA
NO! and his parents, girl friend and all realatives should be placed in prison as conspitors until he comes back to the United States of America to face his charges. 6 years ago from a Republican in Yuma, AZ
Yes and No. He should be granted immunity for disclosures of domestic surveillance and charged for disclosures of spying against hostile foreign powers like China and Russia. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Stillwater, MN
I think what Edward Snowden did was wrong. While it is the right of the public to know, he should not have knowingly broken his contract by leaking the documents to the public. If this were a true example of civil disobedience, he would willingly face the... 6 years ago from a Democrat in Portland, OR
No, I think that Edward Snowden broke a law, and if he is to be brought back without standing trial, we need to amend or abolish the current laws relating to the NSA's activities. However, I think that NSA and CIA need to be punished for this... 6 years ago from a Democrat in Pacifica, CA
Yes if he is a whistleblower to protect the U.S. Citizens and U.S. Constitution from a overreaching and potentially tyrannical U.S. Government. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Paradise, CA
Clemency, not 100% immunity. 6 years ago from a Socialist in Saint Cloud, MN