In June 2019 tensions between the U.S. and Iran escalated after a U.S. surveillance drone was shot down by Iran’s revolutionary guard in the Gulf of Oman. The U.S. claimed it was an “unprovoked attack” and the drone was flying in international airspace. 2 weeks earlier the Trump administration blamed Iran for the attacks on two oil tankers who were bombed in the Gulf of Oman. Iran denied any involvement. In early June Iran announced that it would break its uranium stockpile limit set under the 2015 Iran nuclear deal. Under the deal Iran was allowed to keep a maximum of 660 pounds of uranium enriched to 3.67%. Analysts predict that if the uranium is enriched to 20% or more Iran would be capable of developing nuclear weapons.
14% Yes |
86% No |
7% Yes |
71% No |
6% Yes, but only if they develop nuclear weapons |
15% No, the U.S. should encourage Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels |
1% Yes, but only with missile strikes |
See how support for each position on “Iran” has changed over time for 144k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Iran” has changed over time for 144k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9D5XBHH9mos9MO
No, because a war with Iran will only benefit Jewish interest.
@8J8CLTQ4yrs4Y
@8XGTXTZ2yrs2Y
@9C5KXGM11mos11MO
No, because war with Iran will only benefit Jewish interest.
@9JDPKH43mos3MO
No, but efforts should be made to destabilize the current authoritarian government there and support a secular democratic republic.
@9474P2G2yrs2Y
No, unless Iran attacks us.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Iran” news articles, updated frequently.
@ISIDEWITH37mins37m
In a significant diplomatic move, Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdogan held talks with Hamas political leader Ismail Haniyeh in Istanbul, amidst escalating tensions in the Middle East. The meeting, which took place at the historic Dolmabahce Palace, comes at a time when the region is on edge…
@ISIDEWITH7hrs7H
In a significant development that has drawn the attention of the international community, world leaders are making concerted efforts to prevent the escalation of tensions between Iran and Israel. This comes in the wake of an apparent Israeli airstrike near an Iranian air base and nuclear facility, an…
@ThrilledB4llotBox1 day1D
If the bill's supporters get what they want, millions of Americans would find their ability to access TikTok terminated by the government, just in time for the November 2024 election. This radical state intervention was endorsed last week by the House Energy and Commerce Committee in a unanimous 50-0 vote, establishing a coveted bipartisan consensus in favor of expelling American users from their preferred social media platform. This extreme action is to be carried out, as usual, in the alleged name of "national security," and to more aggressively combat perceived "foreign adversaries."The bill names TikTok as a "foreign adversary controlled application," with the "adversary" in question being China, but it also goes further and prohibits "applications" associated with the standard litany of official U.S. "adversaries"—Russia, North Korea, and Iran. More additions to the list are always possible, perhaps in the event that Cuba or Venezuela develop a short-form dance video app that becomes suspiciously popular with American teens.Another provision authorizes the President, who is currently Joe Biden and may soon be Donald Trump, to make unilateral determinations about whether certain applications "present a significant threat to the national security of the United States," and therefore must be banned like TikTok. The criteria for making such a determination is left conspicuously vague.So if you really want to give Biden or Trump more unilateral power to control the proliferation of content online, this appears to be just the bill for you.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
@ISIDEWITH12yrs12Y
On August 1st, 2012 the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) required all health insurers and employers to cover the cost of contraceptives in their health insurance plans. The provision currently exempts religious organizations and churches.