More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Income ($75K-$100K) voters
Last answered 7 minutes ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Income ($75K-$100K) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Jan 9, 2014. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Income data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
5 years ago by rt.com
5 years ago by net.au
5 years ago by theguardian.com
5 years ago by nytimes.com
5 years ago by net.au
5 years ago by bbc.co.uk
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
In a safer form, not in its current poisonous form. We shouldn't be leaving buried chemicals in the ground that will eventually seep into water supplies. In fact, why are they using the poisonous chemicals that they use now anyways, when they have... 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Huntsville, TX
Yes, but be smart about it- I.E. Take into consideration where you will be fracking and if it will affect peoples homes, water, health and overall well being and quality of living. 6 years ago from a Republican in North Richland Hills, TX
Yes, but not in highly populated areas with more vision on what the results to the earth are and if its more harm then good sotta stop. 6 years ago from a Republican in San Jacinto, CA
Concerns are based on sound evidence. Companies need to be controlled in their pursuit of oil at the expense of h2o and peoples health. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Venice, FL
Yes, with greatly increased oversight but while also pursing renewable sources of energy such as solar, hydro, and wind power. 6 years ago from a Green in Macomb, MI
Yes but it needs to be done responsibly. Also there should be ongoing monitoring of its effects on the earth and environment. Again, oil is a finite commodity so look for alternative sources of energy. 6 years ago from a Green in Kimberly, WI
We must learn more about the outcome related with fracking and the chemicals involved before turning loose an industry which has no goal beyond the bottomline. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Jordan, NY
Let the free market decide the best forms of energy. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Morganton, NC
Yes, but with unbiased testing, and not in highly populated areas, and with excessive oversight. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Sun City, AZ
More oversight is needed, and improve methods to insure the environment is protected without polluting the water, etc. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Laveen, AZ
No, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking and we should pursue more sustainable energy sources as well. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Colton, CA
No, fracking destroys local environments and the people effected are gagged to prevent speaking about it. There is something wrong with the industry and they know it. 6 years ago from a Green in Wood River, IL
No, fracking has great potential to negatively impact people who have no power to decide if or where it will be done. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Dublin, OH
No, fracking has far too many negative effects on the environment; namely groundwater supplies. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Fosterville, TN
Yes, but with extremely heavy fines to companies which pollute while doing so. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Cypress, TX
It depends on what liquids are used for the process (e.g., water vs. chemicals). 6 years ago from a Democrat in Long Island City, NY
It should be allowed with proper governmental inspections and regulations.
All drilling should be subject to Clean Air and Water Acts. 6 years ago from a Democrat in West Jordan, UT
Yes, but we should also pursue more sustainable energy sources and do more research to measure long term effects of fracking and stop if we find it problematic,. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Southampton, PA
In some cases yes, with taxation and regulation. Environmental protection and human safety are key issues here. 6 years ago from a Republican in Temple, PA
Ok to allow, but continue research on long-term effects. 6 years ago from a Republican in Phoenix, AZ
No, have you seen the videos of people lighting their water on fire?. 6 years ago from a Peace and Freedom in Waconia, MN