In 2021 the U.S. Border Patrol reported 1,659,206 encounters with migrants at the U.S.-Mexico border, narrowly exceeding the prior highs of 1,643,679 in 2000 and 1,615,844 in 1986. The Border Patrol reported 608,037 encounters with Mexican nationals in 2021, accounting for 37% of the total. The remaining 1,051,169 encounters, or 63%, involved people from countries other than Mexico – by far the highest total for non-Mexican nationals in CBP records dating back to 2000. Congress has passed at least four laws since 1986 authorizing increases in Border Patrol personnel. The number of bor…
Read more71% Yes |
29% No |
67% Yes |
17% No |
4% Yes, and allow border states to manage their own security policy |
6% No, make it easier for immigrants to access temporary work visas |
5% No, just enforce the current border policy |
|
1% No, and we should implement an open border policy |
See how support for each position on “Border Security” has changed over time for 15.8m America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Border Security” has changed over time for 15.8m America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@8FYQYQH4yrs4Y
No, and we should implement an open border policy, but with background checks
@9D437JK9mos9MO
Yes and decrease the price of the immigration process
@92QY7WF2yrs2Y
No, just end the welfare state
@4Y4S97J3yrs3Y
Yes but set refugee camps close to border to help people that had to leave their home because of danger
@566G5R23yrs3Y
Close the borders completely with 30 foot tall electrified walls with missile turrets
@4XV4YPV3yrs3Y
Yes, I also believe border security should be a part of the U.S. Military.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Border Security” news articles, updated frequently.
@ISIDEWITH17hrs17H
In a move that marks a historic moment in U.S. politics, House Republicans are set to deliver articles of impeachment against Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, making him the first cabinet official to face such charges in 150 years. The impeachment process, which has been months in the making, stems from allegations related to Mayorkas' handling of the U.S. southern border, amid record numbers of migrant encounters. The House, led by a narrow GOP majority, passed two articles of impeachment against Mayorkas in a tight 214-213 vote, highlighting the contentious nature of this political battle.The decision to proceed with impeachment was not made lightly, with Republicans delaying the process to build a stronger case and to accommodate requests from GOP senators. This strategic delay underscores the complexities and potential hurdles that lie ahead as the articles make their way to the Senate, where Democrats hold sway. The move against Mayorkas has been characterized by some as a reflection of the deep divisions and political polarization currently gripping the nation.As the House prepares to formally send the impeachment articles to the Senate, the political landscape is bracing for turbulence. This unprecedented action against a sitting cabinet official has sparked a wide range of reactions, from staunch support among Mayorkas' critics to vehement opposition from those who view the impeachment as politically motivated. The Senate's response and the subsequent proceedings will be closely watched, as they will not only determine Mayorkas' fate but also set a precedent for future confrontations between the executive branch and Congress.The implications of this historic impeachment go beyond the immediate political fallout. They touch on broader issues of governance, accountability, and the mechanisms through which the U.S. navigates disputes within its highest ranks of power. As the nation watches, the case against Alejandro Mayorkas unfolds against a backdrop of intense debate over immigration policy and border security, topics that remain at the forefront of America's political discourse.As the articles of impeachment are delivered to the Senate, the country stands at a crossroads. The outcome of this process will not only shape the career of Secretary Mayorkas but also potentially redefine the boundaries of political accountability and the balance of power within the U.S. government. In this historic moment, the actions taken by House Republicans and the response from the Senate will be remembered as a significant chapter in the ongoing story of American democracy.
@ISIDEWITH4 days4D
In a concerning lapse of national security, an Afghan migrant who was on the U.S. terror watchlist spent an entire year freely roaming the United States after being released by Border Patrol. The individual, identified as a member of a 'Western' terror group, was initially apprehended in March 2023 after illegally crossing into the United States at San Ysidro, California. Despite the grave implications of his watchlist status, he was inexplicably released into the U.S. interior, sparking a flurry of criticism and raising serious questions about the effectiveness of U.S. border security measures.The case, which has only recently come to light, underscores a potentially dangerous gap in the U.S. immigration system. The Afghan national's presence in the country went unchecked for over a year, during which time the reasons for his initial release remained unclear. It wasn't until the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) took action that the individual was taken back into custody, highlighting a critical delay in addressing a significant security risk.This incident is not isolated. Officials have indicated that it is one of at least three cases involving suspected terrorists being inadvertently released into the U.S. after crossing the southern border. Such occurrences have ignited a debate over the adequacy of current border control policies and the need for stringent measures to prevent similar oversights in the future.The revelation of these lapses has prompted calls for a thorough review of border security protocols and the mechanisms in place for vetting individuals on terror watchlists. Critics argue that the safety of American citizens could be compromised if individuals with potential ties to terrorism are allowed to enter and remain in the country without proper scrutiny.As the U.S. grapples with the complexities of managing its southern border, this incident serves as a stark reminder of the challenges facing national security in an era of increased mobility and migration. The need for a balanced approach that ensures the security of the nation's borders while upholding humanitarian principles is more critical than ever.
@ISIDEWITH5 days5D
The percentage of Latinos who say they support building a border wall and deporting all undocumented immigrants has jumped by at least 10 points since 2021, according to the latest Axios-Ipsos Latino Poll in partnership with Noticias Telemundo.Why it matters: The findings suggest former President Trump's calls for more border security — and perhaps his anti-immigrant rhetoric — are registering even among people who may have ties to immigration.The findings also reflect the frustration that has made illegal immigration a top election-year issue for many Americans, and shed light on Republicans' recent inroads among Latinos.The poll arrives as Trump's racist criticisms of immigrants are raising concerns about violence during the 2024 campaign.42% of Latino adults surveyed said they support building a wall or fence along the entire U.S.–Mexico border. That's a 12-point jump from December 2021.38% support sending all undocumented immigrants in the U.S. back to their country of origin — up from 28% in 2021.In addition, 64% of Latinos said they support giving the president the authority to shut U.S. borders if there are too many immigrants trying to enter the country. It was the first time the survey asked this question.Support for building a wall was strongest among Cuban Americans (58%), who generally are more conservative than many other Latinos and have benefited from decades of Cold War-era "special treatment" on immigration.Support for the border wall is lowest among Mexican immigrants and Mexican Americans (37%). Only 43% of Central Americans support the wall.Immigration is the third-highest concern among Latinos in this election year, the poll found, behind inflation and crime.Despite the rising number of Latinos who say anyone in the U.S. illegally should be deported, a strong majority (65%) still favor providing them with a path to U.S. citizenship rather than deporting them.59% support allowing refugees fleeing crime and violence in Latin America to claim asylum in the U.S. The poll "illustrates that some immigration hardline positions (are) incrementally more popular" among Latinos, Ipsos pollster and senior vice president Chris Jackson tells Axios.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
