More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Green Party
Last answered 7 minutes ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Green Party.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Apr 10, 2014. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
4 years ago by sciencealert.com
4 years ago by npr.org
5 years ago by washingtonexaminer.com
5 years ago by filmsforaction.org
5 years ago by theguardian.com
5 years ago by huffingtonpost.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
Eliminate corporate subsidies and reconfigure to a more equitable tax structure which forces trickle down. 6 years ago from a Green in Gainesville, GA
Spending should be reviewed on an individual basis and taxes should be increased in some instances. 6 years ago from a Green in Fort Lauderdale, FL
Yes, but spending cuts need to be made correctly. Reducing paperwork is the first step, cutting corporate paperwork is the next. We should also spend a little bit more to encourage business growth in America. We do need to increase taxes but only to... 6 years ago from a Green in Country Club Hills, IL
The government should cut spending towards national security to reduce the national debt, and should increase spending on infrastructure. 6 years ago from a Green in Lancaster, PA
Government overspending needs to be curbed, starting with every voted official in Washington DC. Politicians have absolutely no concept of their constituent's financial straits, yet they keep voting themselves raises at the public's expense. 6 years ago from a Green in Eugene, OR
Yes, with a focus on bloated programs such as the military. 6 years ago from a Green in San Juan Capistrano, CA
Yes, but not cuts to programs the promote jobs, economic growth, or those that help those out of work. 6 years ago from a Green in Glencoe, MO
The total level of debt has very little to do with discretionary spending. The debt should be reduced by mildly increasing taxes on the wealthy (with a sunset clause) and decreasing military spending. 6 years ago from a Green in Ashburn, VA
Yes, and make the tax system something the average person can understand. 75,000 pages of legalese is not understandable by lawyers let alone the typical blue color worker. And make the ultra wealthy pay a percentage just the same as I do, not so many... 6 years ago from a Green in Coldwater, MI
No, severe cuts to the Department of Defense should be initiated to compensate and imperialist wars be ended. 6 years ago from a Green in Elkhart, IN
Cuts need to be made judiciously. Look into areas of waste, overlapping services and better ways to accomplish goals while spending less money but still good services. 6 years ago from a Green in Rock Springs, WY
Reduce the size of the Federal government, thereby spending will be reduced. 6 years ago from a Green in Medford, OR
No. They should cut "defense" spending to reduce national debt ($700 billion a year is ridiculous). They should also abolish the PRIVATE Federal Reserve Banks whose privately owned members create the lion's share of the national debt by... 6 years ago from a Green in Fort Wayne, IN
No, put 80% of the military budget into public infrastructure instead. 6 years ago from a Green in Ridgewood, NY
No, the federal government should make cuts to defense spending instead. 6 years ago from a Green in Coraopolis, PA
Instead of wasting millions , if not trillions of dollars on things that do not need money like the military and sending more guns and troops to the middle east, the government should looking at ways to help the people and lower , if not get rid of the... 6 years ago from a Green in Palm Beach, FL
Yes, but not to public works, welfare, or other programs that serve the common good. 6 years ago from a Green in Lafayette, LA