More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Income ($75K-$100K) voters
Last answered 3 years ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Income ($75K-$100K) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Aug 18, 2012. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Income data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
5 years ago by indiatimes.com
5 years ago by net.au
5 years ago by youtube.com
6 years ago by politicalears.com
7 years ago by youtube.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
Yes, allow limited drilling and forestry, using best practical ecological means, as well as use hunting to control over population of some species. 6 years ago from a Republican in Carlsbad, TX
The gov does own too much land. Each state should be able be have eligible voters decide if some land should be opened for recreation or industry, or sale to pay down the national debt (non-citizens or foreign countries should never be allowed to own any... 6 years ago from a Republican in Stewartstown, PA
Cost too much for government to do this...hire privately to preserve and protect. 6 years ago from a Republican in Auburn, ME
Parks should be administered, but they should not be expected to remain unchanged. 6 years ago from a Republican in Pearland, TX
Choose more wisely which lands deserve to be declared "Parks." Remove the ultra-ego's of the N.P.S to declare any property a "Park" because of an inflated individual ego!. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Arnold, MO
Yes. but let the states have a say in what land is added to the parks registry and i think that more land should be set aside for national parks. i also think that the budget for national parks should be offset by maybe a fee charged to tourist. most... 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Roanoke, LA
Yes, but no more new acquisitions, the EPA stops over- regulating and the government should sell land back to private citizens whenever feasible. 6 years ago from a Republican in Mission, KS
Yes, but allow states to lease the land to increase profits from the parks and keep the lease holders under tight supervision. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Pinehurst, MA
No, and they shouldn't be government property in the first place. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Annapolis, MD
Yes, expand the government's domain to protect more land and stop logging, drilling and mining. 6 years ago from a Democrat in San Luis Obispo, CA
The National Parks should be returned to their rightful and legal owner: The Native American Nation. 6 years ago from a Green in Conshohocken, PA
Yes, but allow the states to manage all aspects of the land. The Federal Government should only be involved in an oversight capacity. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Walton, KY
Yes, but the funding should from the community of citizens. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Dover, NJ
National parks, such as Yosemite should be controlled by the local residents that reside in the states where the parks are located, but should remain protected by the federal government. The preservation should be solely under the control of those who... 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Leo, IN
No, it is not clear how well these lands are protected given all the logging and cattle ranching. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Fort Pierce, FL
Yes, but allow more public access using some of the infrastructure already built for logging, etc if not in a sensitive area and allow use\sale of the resources in a smart and safe manner and increase the royalty fees. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Ridgefield, WA
Sell the land to private owners on the condition that they keep the Parks for their previously intended purpose as a preserved land and a tourist attraction. The new owners can hire staff to work at and maintain the Parks. Creates jobs and saves the... 6 years ago from a Democrat in Framingham, MA
Allow for the private sector to make inputs on some National Park lands. If the federal government cannot afford to keep the land, sell to someone or something (denoting a corporation or what have you) who is willing to preserve said property for future... 6 years ago from a Republican in Canton, NY
Yes, but do not let private businesses profit from land that the taxpayers own and allow more public access to those who will respect the pristine areas. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Palm City, FL
All National Parks should be enlarged, and the portions thereof given to the Native American Tribes from which they were taken in the first place. 6 years ago from a Republican in Littleton, CO
Yes, with the help of private non profit organizations, while keeping the economy in mind. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Northampton, PA
Long-term agreements should be available to local and state governments as well as certain corporate entities as ANYONE manages more efficiently than the Feds. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Kent, WA
Yes, but not lower the protection slightly. 6 years ago from a Republican in Blackstone, IL
Our National Parks are a treasure of open lands that should be preserved for as long as is practical to prevent the loss of all of our wilderness areas. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Pflugerville, TX
Public lands should be irrevocably preserved and protected by our Federal Government for wildlife habitat and recreation, NOT for corporate use. Wildlife should have precedence over grazing livestock and there should be no drilling, mining or other... 6 years ago from a Democrat in Lebanon, OR