More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Household (Non-Married Couple) voters
Last answered 4 years ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Household (Non-Married Couple) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Aug 18, 2012. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Household data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
6 years ago by indiatimes.com
6 years ago by net.au
6 years ago by youtube.com
6 years ago by politicalears.com
7 years ago by youtube.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
National Parks should continue to be preserved as a national park nominally by the government. however all forms of protection and natural upkeep should be handled by willing members of the public that enjoy and preserve the park already. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Glendale, AZ
Someone should protect them, but I don't know if the best caretaker is the government. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Cary, NC
Yes. but let the states have a say in what land is added to the parks registry and i think that more land should be set aside for national parks. i also think that the budget for national parks should be offset by maybe a fee charged to tourist. most... 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Roanoke, LA
The majority of superfund sites are owned by the government. They have proven unreliable when it comes to protecting the environment. 7 years ago from a Republican in Lafayette, IN
No, and they shouldn't be government property in the first place. 7 years ago from a Libertarian in Annapolis, MD
Natural areas should belong to the community and entities that infringe on them should be dealt with violently if necessary. 7 years ago from a Socialist in Portland, OR
With regard to natural state parks (forests, bays, etc.), the federal gov is well-intentioned to manage and protect them from human interference, but past efforts at "preservation" have caused ecological disasters. So yeah, that. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Worcester, MA
Yes, but work with the states to determine how to use the land. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Norman, OK
No. They should be protected by the private sector but with set guidelines set by the government that do not allow the private sector to sell or exploit the land. 7 years ago from a Libertarian in Carterville, IL
While the national government should preserve the parks, the state governments should have the ability to prevent the feds from federalizing an excessive amount of their land. 7 years ago from a Republican in Madison, WI