More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Libertarians
Last answered 6 minutes ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Libertarians.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Nov 10, 2014. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
3 years ago by theguardian.com
3 years ago by dailycaller.com
3 years ago by washingtonpost.com
3 years ago by forbes.com
3 years ago by newsbusters.org
3 years ago by telegraph.co.uk
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Learn more about Climate Change
Global warming, or climate change, is an increase in the earth's atmospheric temperature since the late nineteenth century. In politics the debate over global warming is centered on whether this increase in temperature is due to greenhouse gas emissions or is the result of a natural pattern in the earth's temperature. See recent climate change news
More stances on this issue
No, government regulations risk becoming corrupt and harming the people and things they are supposed to protect. 3 years ago from a Libertarian in Vinings, GA
No, the government should increase environmental regulations to prevent the destruction of our environment. Do not politicize protecting the environment by tying regulations to global warming. 3 years ago from a Libertarian in Houston, TX
This question is wrong, as the real problem has always been corruption/cronyism and failure to enforce property rights. Regulations are written by cronies more to the benefit of polluters than to our environment or property owners. Regulations have... 1 year ago from a Libertarian in Clay City, IN
No, simply promote veganism. 1 year ago from a Libertarian in Massapequa, NY
No evidence that CO2 is the dominant factor. Climate has changed relatively little in the past several decades. Almost all predictions for the amount of change have been wrong. 2 years ago from a Libertarian in Evansville, IN
Change it to global pollution instead of global warming and you'll get more bi partisan support to curb any root causes. 3 years ago from a Libertarian in North Decatur, GA
I believe in the free market if the government instead of forcing people to go green makes their non greenness know people can choose to go with other companies costing the less green company money thus making them want to go green to beat the other... 3 years ago from a Libertarian in Midland, NC
No, global warming is a natural occurrence. But it is good for businesses to be ethical. Provide fees for unethical environmental practices. 3 years ago from a Libertarian in Coral Bay, VI
No, tax carbon emissions instead. 3 years ago from a Libertarian in San Francisco, CA
No. Environmental regulations will not prevent global warming. 3 years ago from a Libertarian in Austin, TX
If it can be proven that global warming exists, and is caused by the emission of greenhouse gasses, the biggest cause of global warming must be the government. Early automobiles were a novelty, only afforded by the wealthiest Americans. It was not until... 3 years ago from a Libertarian in Williamsburg, FL
Global warming is nonsense and/or far distant and maybe beneficial; nonetheless, Gov. should take some interest in preventing needless and immediate pollution. 3 years ago from a Libertarian in Thousand Oaks, CA