More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Associate's Degree voters
Last answered 29 minutes ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Associate's Degree voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Dec 12, 2011. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Education data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
- District of Columbia
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- West Virginia
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
7 years ago by news.com.au
7 years ago by allout.org
7 years ago by twentytwowords.com
7 years ago by bbc.co.uk
7 years ago by upworthy.com
8 years ago by youtube.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
Individual decision, does not need a master to grant permission. 7 years ago from a Republican in Gardiner, ME
Call it a partnershjp, and give them rights - but DON'T call it marriage!. 7 years ago from a Republican in West Bend, WI
Take the word "marriage" away from the government. EVERYONE should have civil unions. That would allow for all the legal rights, obligations and privileges for "partners". Then if people wanted to have a spiritual union, they could... 7 years ago from a Republican in Goshen, CA
Let them marry but deny benefits. 7 years ago from a Republican in Westerville, OH
Who cares. The entire idea is for spousal compensation. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Dunedin, FL
Take the government out of marriage and instead make it a religious decision. Replace marriage under the law with civil unions. Provide government benefits and rights through civil unions, only. People can choose to have a religious marriage, a civil... 7 years ago from a Republican in Normal, IL
Yes, unless the U.S. tax code is changed to allow domestic partnerships and civil unions the same financial benefits marriages have. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Springfield Gardens, NY
Allow gay marriage to be held only in city halls or courts or anything that has to do with the States for all 50 States and allow these ceremonies to be held in accepted Churches of religion. Whomever disagrees may not take violent action. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Fort Washington, MD
Allow civil unions for same-sex couples but don't call it marriage, but have equal benefits to what married couples have. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Lewisville, TX
Separate the religious and civil aspects of marriage. The government recognizes civil unions for all couples, gay or straight, then let the churches decide which ones they will recognize. 7 years ago from a Green in Federal Way, WA
All marriage should be banned. Couples do not need special rights over singles. 7 years ago from a Green in Columbia City, IN