Глобальное потепление, или изменение климата, — это повышение температуры атмосферы Земли с конца девятнадцатого века. В политике дебаты о глобальном потеплении сосредоточены на том, связано ли это повышение температуры с выбросами парниковых газов или является результатом естественного изменения температуры Земли. В 2022 году Конгресс принял Закон о снижении инфляции, который предусматривал субсидии на сотни миллиардов долларов для инвестирования в проекты в области возобновляемых источников энергии и производства энергии из возобновляемых источников. Законопроект также включает кред…
Прочитайте больше@ISIDEWITH5 мес.5MO
Когда вы думаете о балансе между экономическим ростом и защитой окружающей среды, что вы отдаете приоритетом и почему?
@ISIDEWITH5 мес.5MO
Представьте себе мир с более чистым воздухом, но более высокой стоимостью жизни из-за строгих экологических норм; как этот компромисс повлияет на ваше мнение?
@ISIDEWITH5 мес.5MO
Как возможность увеличения числа стихийных бедствий из-за изменения климата влияет на ваше мнение о вмешательстве правительства?
@ISIDEWITH5 мес.5MO
Заметили ли вы какие-либо последствия изменения климата в вашем сообществе и какие меры, по вашему мнению, можно было бы принять на местном уровне?
@ISIDEWITH5 мес.5MO
Как, по вашему мнению, будущие поколения будут оценивать наши нынешние усилия по борьбе с изменением климата?
@ISIDEWITH5 мес.5MO
Вспомните момент, когда вы почувствовали личную связь с природой; как сохранение этого чувства повлияет на ваше отношение к экологическим нормам?
@ISIDEWITH5 мес.5MO
Если бы вам пришлось отказаться от одного удобства, чтобы сократить выбросы, что бы это было и почему?
@ISIDEWITH5 мес.5MO
Какие изменения вы заметили в местных погодных условиях и как, по вашему мнению, общество должно отреагировать?
@ISIDEWITH5 мес.5MO
Представьте себе мир, в котором некоторые животные вымерли из-за утраты среды обитания; как это заставляет вас задуматься о нашей нынешней экологической политике?
@ISIDEWITH5 мес.5MO
Как бы вы себя почувствовали, если бы на ваше любимое место на открытом воздухе повлияла экстремальная погода, и какие шаги, по вашему мнению, можно было бы предотвратить?
@2TLJD2W3 года3Y
No because no matter what the United States does to help the environment, there are many countries who abuse the environment just like we do today. The United States could be the cleanest most environmentally friendly nation in the world but we would be the only one. If you are going to put more regulations do it for the whole world. The environment is more than just the U.S.
@2TLGYPC4 года4Y
Not convinced there is global warming. That said, everyone should be good stewards of the earth God gave us to live on rather than be after that almighty dollar.
@2TLG3SB4 года4Y
This is a way to kill jobs. Businesses should do all they can to preserve the environment while creating jobs.
@2TLD96VЛибертарианец4 года4Y
Non-profits should be encouraged to spearhead this campaign through private donations
@2TLC6JQ4 года4Y
Anthropogenic global warming is a scam perpetrated by the United Nations.
@2TL4MPH4 года4Y
Change it to global pollution instead of global warming and you'll get more bi partisan support to curb any root causes.
@2TJ68PR3 года3Y
Global warming is a natural occurrence however we should still do what ever we can to protect the environment. The incentives need to be enough to warrant the business implementing them. I know a City who dumps sewage into a river and pays the fines because it is less than the cost to handle the sewage properly. That's messed up.
@2THY3CW3 года3Y
Environmental regulations to control pollution are fine, but not in the name of "global warming" or "climate change." While I believe these are natural climate cycles, there is no harm in seeking to prevent egregious pollution.
@2THSPM74 года4Y
No, tax carbon emissions instead. But also tax other emissions so that activities show their true environmental cost. Then use the collected money for environmental restoration and preservation.
@2THPT283 года3Y
No EPA should not increase regulations to prevent global warming. The U.S. does plenty to reduce carbon emissions to the detriment of jobs and the economy. Pressure counties like China, India, and Brazil to reduce their carbon emissions. Never hear liberals complain about these countires.
@2THP64K4 года4Y
government should stop the politics of environmental regulation; no funding for AGW; no Kyoto; no carbon tax; no secret treaties; no wealth transfer to UN or foreign despots
@2THJF6N3 года3Y
Climate change is natural phenomenon and has and continues to change regardless of man's activities. Government policies should be based on science (not consensus) aimed at mitigating the effects of climate changes.
@2TH9XX54 года4Y
I believe in the free market if the government instead of forcing people to go green makes their non greenness know people can choose to go with other companies costing the less green company money thus making them want to go green to beat the other companies.
@2TH8GMG4 года4Y
This issue is based on politically motivated science. I don't think there is enough information to accurately make a decision.
@2TGK3KJ4 года4Y
Petroleum companies should not be allowed billions in corporate wellfare. The rest should take care of itself.
@2JJ24KZ3 года3Y
No, they need to reevaluate the thousands of laws and restrictions they already have and apply some common sense regulations.
@2JHYXCV4 года4Y
Provide incentives for alternative energy production, stop subsidizing oil and gas and coal.
@2JHV9LG3 года3Y
No, global warming is a natural occurrence. But it is good for businesses to be ethical. Provide fees for unethical environmental practices.
@2JHV4MY4 года4Y
No, government regulations risk becoming corrupt and harming the people and things they are supposed to protect.
@2JHSK7V4 года4Y
There is no Global warming! It's the natural cycle of the Earth. Right now, we're in a cooling phase, not warming.
@2JHRNW44 года4Y
Emissions are a problem, but many of the alternative energy solutions are worse. We fool ourselves into believing that an electric car is better for the environment because we don't see the emissions....but much of the power for electrics comes from coal. Furthermore, the batteries are often made with unrecyclable materials that are quite toxic. Fund the research, but never be satisfied with the results.
@2JHP99W3 года3Y
global warming cycles are normal, but adding incentives for alternate forms of energy should be consider to reduce any man made impact.
@NewEnglandDevil4 года4Y
No, it is far more efficient to adapt to changing conditions, regardless of cause. Additionally, there are benefits to global warming including food production, reduced mortality due to cold weather, etc.
@2JHGFJP4 года4Y
More unilateral action by our govt. while countries like China build things like huge canals through the rainforests and use the proceeds for a historic record peacetime military buildup is stupid.
@2JHBJMV4 года4Y
Depends on the motivation behind those regulations and the science backing them. Track record so far is to find ways to increase tax with little or no environmental outcome - so NO, not without very good reason.
@2JH6QQZ3 года3Y
Some regulation is needed but we also need to ensure we don't make it so complicated that businesses cannot compete in the US. or make it a requirement that goods shipped to the Us have to have the same standards as they would here. This will ensure more jobs stay here
@2JH38WY4 года4Y
Penalties should be higher and stricter to keep environmental damage in check
@2JGLR2Y4 года4Y
Government should increase environmental regulations when bad actors are harming the environment. Same type of question back to you: Should government increase financial regulations to prevent global financial problems?
@2JG9DD3Либертарианец4 года4Y
No, the government should increase environmental regulations to prevent the destruction of our environment. Do not politicize protecting the environment by tying regulations to global warming.
@2JG6MBR3 года3Y
Truthful studies are needed and only then should regulations be implemented, but not just based on theory, and proof has not been confirmed in the last 50 years, they should go back 200 years to determine if the earth is heating up or just a 100 year cycle.
@2JFRCZ64 года4Y
No. Environmental regulations will not prevent global warming.
@2JDXSJT3 года3Y
If it can be proven that global warming exists, and is caused by the emission of greenhouse gasses, the biggest cause of global warming must be the government. Early automobiles were a novelty, only afforded by the wealthiest Americans. It was not until our government poured trillions into building new and improving existing roads did the auto industry flourish. Then, with the government creating housing projects and government subsidized housing, criminals found it affordable to live in our nation's wealthiest zip codes, which caused a fleeing to the suburbs to avoid the government caus… Прочитайте больше
@2JDLZ9K3 года3Y
Global warming is more natural than the ideologues would have you believe. I am for alternate energy but not before it is an economically viable solution. I do not approve of the govt forcing policies and technology before they are efficient and affordable. Pushing policies before affordable efficient alternatives exist push more people into poverty and dependence on the govt
@2JDG89PРеспубликанец4 года4Y
Yes, the government should always be looking to increase environmental regulations not because of Global Warming but because it is the best thing for the earth, but in balance with economics, technologies and incentives for American companies to grow. And truly for the environment and not to win votes or make friends wealthy.
@2JDB5GX3 года3Y
Yes. Especially become aggressive in activism pertaining to regulations for the countries that are the greatest threats to our environment.
@2JD6LJ84 года4Y
Halt production of chemicals, GMO's, insist of a zero discharge technology as an interim to a space-based manufacturing technology. Obviously the surface of the earth is not suitable to the evolution of an industrial technology. Best savings are from conservation first then develop decentralized energy production, mostly solar. Stop all coal, nukes, etc. Clean up the mess!
@2JD5LR94 года4Y
Историческая активность пользователей, взаимодействующих с этим question .
Загрузка данных...
Загрузка диаграммы...
Загрузка политических тем пользователей, участвовавших в этом обсуждении
Загрузка данных...