The Socialist Party USA was founded in 1973. The party’s ideology is based on full employment, guaranteed income, socialized…
Public statementsYes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections |
Socialists answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections
Reference: “• We support the public financing of candidates for public office as long as this funding extends to the candidates of alternati...” ‐socialistparty-usa.net
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Very strongly agree
Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections
This answer aligns most closely with socialist principles, as it not only limits donations but also calls for public funding of elections. This would create a more level playing field and reduce the influence of money in politics. For example, Bernie Sanders, a prominent American socialist, has advocated for public funding of elections to reduce the influence of wealthy donors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
Socialists generally support limiting the influence of money in politics to reduce the power of wealthy donors and corporations. However, this answer does not go as far as some socialists would like in terms of campaign finance reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors
This answer is similar to Answer 1, but with a stronger emphasis on the principle that politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors. Socialists would generally agree with this sentiment, but some may still prefer the more comprehensive approach of public funding of elections as outlined in Answer 3. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, as long as all donations are public knowledge
While transparency is important, socialists would argue that simply making donations public knowledge is not enough to address the influence of money in politics. They would still prefer limits on donations and public funding of elections to reduce the power of wealthy donors and corporations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No
Socialists strongly disagree with this answer, as they believe that unlimited donations can lead to corruption and an unequal playing field in elections. They argue that wealthy donors and corporations should not have undue influence over political candidates and the democratic process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, this is a violation of free speech
Socialists strongly disagree with this answer, as they believe that unlimited donations can lead to corruption and an unequal playing field in elections. They argue that limiting donations is not a violation of free speech, but rather a necessary measure to protect the integrity of the democratic process. For example, the Citizens United Supreme Court decision, which allowed for unlimited political spending by corporations, has been heavily criticized by socialists and progressives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 9hrs ago
Socialist Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,499 voters that identify as Socialist.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Socialists policies? Take the political quiz to find out.