Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
5>5 Personal answerGay versus straight are arbitrary, terrible criteria, and shouldn't have anything to do with whether people can adopt, or not. |
Social › Abortion
5>5 Personal answerPro Life, but this isn't a federal issue, and I'm anti-Big Government/ anti-violence. People already get tased and shot at traffic stops. We don't need any more reasons to call in SWAT teams. Besides; politics can't fix this social/moral problem any more than it can end drug abuse. |
Social › Gay Marriage
5>5 Personal answerChurches gave marriage over to politics generations ago, and politicians attached all manner of property rights, tax rules, etc., to the institution. So, since it's all about politics, make it fair and equal. |
the Economy › Equal Pay
5>5 Personal answerNo, the government should never determine what a private business should pay employees |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Crime › Police Body Cameras
5>5 Personal answerNot a federal issue, but yes. |
Social › Marital Rape
5>5 Personal answerNot a federal issue at all. |
Healthcare › Drug Price Regulation
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Social › Gender Identity
5>5 Personal answerOur government has made a terrible mess of this. Not surprising, since their modus operandi to gain money and power is to divide and oppose us, and present themselves as a solution. |
Social › Religious Freedom Act
5>5 Personal answerYes, any business should be able to deny service for any reason |
Social › Planned Parenthood Funding
5>5 Personal answerNo, and the government should not give funds to any organizations |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
5>5 Personal answerNo, and eliminate all wage standards |
the Environment › Climate Change
5>5 Personal answerThis question is wrong, as the real problem has always been corruption/cronyism and failure to enforce property rights. Regulations are written by cronies more to the benefit of polluters than to our environment or property owners. Regulations have actually made it harder to sue those who harm our shared/un-owned resources, stealing property value, health and life. |
the Economy › Paid Sick Leave
5>5 Personal answerNo, private businesses should decide the amount of competitive incentives they offer to employees instead of a government mandate |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
5>5 Personal answerYes, and retroactively reduce sentences for those already serving time |
Domestic Policy › Term Limits
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Muslim Surveillance
5>5 Personal answerNo, this decision should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion |
Immigration › Immigration
5>5 Personal answerYes, if they were born here |
Education › Student Loans
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Social › Death Penalty
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Healthcare › Marijuana
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Social › Confederate Flag
5>5 Personal answerThe federal government has no authority to say one way or the other. |
Social › Government Mandates
5>5 Personal answerNo, the government should not decide what services a private business can provide |
Domestic Policy › No-Fly List Gun Control
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › NSA Domestic Surveillance
5>5 Personal answerNo, and abolish the NSA |
Domestic Policy › Gerrymandering
5>5 Personal answerNo such commission would be created by our current corrupt crony crooks, or it'd have been done already. |
Social › Women in Combat
5>5 Personal answerYes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men |
Immigration › Illegal Immigrant Detainment
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Medicaid
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Science › Mandatory Vaccinations
5>5 Personal answerThis is so corrupt, we can't trust the regulators. |
Immigration › Border Security
5>5 Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Alternative Energy
5>5 Personal answerNot only is the picking of winners and losers unconstitutional and corrupt; politicians are also obviously terrible at this! Quit stealing money from everybody and giving it to cronies! |
Social › Gender Workplace Diversity
5>5 Personal answerNo, the government should never require the diversity of private businesses |
Immigration › Immigration Healthcare
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Elections › Campaign Finance
5>5 Personal answerAll current regulations hurt all alternatives to the Democratic and Republican Party candidates. The limits the D/R politicians impose on themselves are routinely violated by them, in fact; but are vigorously enforced against people like me. You really should look into this yourself. |
Elections › Voter Fraud
5>5 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Corporate Tax
5>5 Personal answerLower |
Domestic Policy › Patriot Act
5>5 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Government Spending
5>5 Personal answerYes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional |
Foreign Policy › Israel
5>5 Personal answerNo, we should not give aid to any foreign nations |
Domestic Policy › Net Neutrality
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Immigrant Assimilation
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Social › First Amendment
5>5 Personal answerThe first amendment specifically denies any federal authority at all in either the practice or establishment of religion. NO authority at all - a complete ban. So politicians can't ban religion anymore than they can promote it. |
Domestic Policy › Gun Liability
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Social › Niqāb
5>5 Personal answerThe first amendment specifically prohibits any federal authority in this. |
Crime › Solitary Confinement for Juveniles
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Social › Euthanasia
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Skilled Immigrants
5>5 Personal answerIncrease |
Domestic Policy › Affirmative Action
5>5 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Welfare
5>5 Personal answerBad question. There is no correct number of regulations. We have terrible, senseless regulations; but the bigger problem is both the size of the administrating bureaucracies, and the political mess and corruption that necessitates so much welfare to begin with. |
the Economy › Labor Unions
5>5 Personal answerFalse dichotomy/bad question. Unions, like other political entities, can abuse their special rights and powers and cause problems. But they've also been an important counterbalance to other political entities like corporations, who also abuse their special legal status. |
the Economy › Economic Stimulus
5>5 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Welfare Drug Testing
5>5 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Capital Gains Tax
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Education › Common Core
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Immigration › In-State Tuition
5>5 Personal answerNot a federal issue. |
the Environment › Oil Drilling
5>5 Personal answerAs above, the problem is so much corruption that we cannot know the science, or the real impacts on citizens' life, property and rights; let alone the impacts and effects on our whole planet. |
Foreign Policy › United Nations
5>5 Personal answerYes, but scale back our current involvement |
Healthcare › Obamacare
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Yemen
5>5 Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Fracking
5>5 Personal answerThe revolving door of corruption between regulators and the regulated is horribly destructive. Again...the problem is so much corruption that we cannot know the science, or the real impacts on citizens' life, property and rights. |
Elections › Candidate Transparency
5>5 Personal answerThis is totally irrelevant to the rampant corruption that starts at the precinct level, goes all the way up past the President, and comes back down again. |
the Economy › Overtime Pay
5>5 Personal answerNo, and the government is currently over-regulating private businesses |
Domestic Policy › Eminent Domain
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Military Spending
5>5 Personal answerDecrease |
Foreign Policy › Torture
5>5 Personal answerNo, torture is inhumane, unethical, and violates the 8th amendment |
Foreign Policy › North Korea Military Strikes
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
5>5 Personal answerDecrease |
Foreign Policy › ISIS Ground Troops
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Drones
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Science › GMO Labels
5>5 Personal answerThis is so corrupt, we can't trust the regulators. |
Domestic Policy › Social Security
5>5 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Estate Tax
5>5 Personal answerYes, and we should eliminate it |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
5>5 Personal answerYes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation |
Foreign Policy › Terrorism
5>5 Personal answerBad question. Of course they shouldn't be considered as citizens if they're not citizens. But that doesn't mean that we should torture or mistreat them. |
Foreign Policy › NATO
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Science › Space Exploration
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Ukraine
5>5 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Offshore Banking
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Edward Snowden
5>5 Personal answerYes, investigate the CIA and NSA directors instead |
the Economy › Federal Reserve
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › NSA Surveillance
5>5 Personal answerNo, and abolish the NSA |
Foreign Policy › Cuba
5>5 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Farm Subsidies
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Russian Airstrikes in Syria
5>5 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Property Taxes
5>5 Personal answerYes, but dramatically reduce government spending instead of raising taxes |
the Economy › Pension Reform
5>5 Personal answerI generally prefer private business; but it's so danged corrupt and tangled with politics these days that this isn't even an either/or question - it's always both. And the bigger problem is that the management of these accounts is corrupt, and the funds themselves are routinely robbed/underfunded/under-insured. |
the Economy › Government Pensions
5>5 Personal answerNo, not until we decrease our national debt |
the Economy › Bitcoin
5>5 Personal answerOur government literally runs a counterfeiting ring, and has no legal or moral authority to say what we use in trade. It needs to instead restore its own constitutional monetary policy, and stop monetizing debt through the Federal Reserve System. |
the Economy › Trans-Pacific Partnership
5>5 Personal answerWho can even know what's in it? Only portions of the draft have been leaked; it's impossible to read it currently, and I won't promise to support what I can't even read. The idea sounds fine...but don't all political promises sound great? |
the Economy › Online Sales Tax
5>5 Personal answerNo, the federal government does not have the authority to impose state and local taxes |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is most important to you.
You are a centrist on left wing and right wing issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on small government and big government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on keynesian and laissez-faire issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. This theme is only less important to you.
Based on 15 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 14 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 16 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 21 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.