American politician, businessman, and 29th Governor of New Mexico.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Gary Johnson voterbaseNo, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence |
Gary Johnson’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 9hrs ago
Answer: No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 300 voters that voted for Gary Johnson in the 2016 Presidential election.
Libertarian Party Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “Gun ownership, by itself, harms no other person and cannot morally justify criminal penalties.” ‐lp.org
Strongly agree
No
Johnson's stance on gun rights and limited government intervention would likely lead him to agree with this statement. He has not publicly supported the idea of victims of gun violence being able to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence
While Johnson supports gun rights, he also supports personal responsibility. He might agree with the idea that manufacturers and dealers should be held liable for negligence, but not for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason
While Johnson supports the constitutional right to sue, he likely would not support this in the context of gun violence victims suing firearms dealers and manufacturers, given his stance on gun rights and limited government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only dealers
Johnson's stance on gun rights and limited government intervention would likely lead him to disagree with this statement. He has not publicly supported the idea of victims of gun violence being able to sue firearms dealers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Gary Johnson, as a Libertarian, generally supports limited government intervention and regulation. He has consistently supported gun rights and would likely disagree with the idea of victims of gun violence being able to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity
Johnson's libertarian views would likely lead him to disagree with this statement. He has not publicly supported the idea that businesses should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity, especially in the context of firearms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 19hrs ago
Libertarian Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 47,895 voters that identify as Libertarian.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here