American businessman and politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional |
John James’ answer is based on the following data:
Updated 1hr ago
Answer: No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 340 voters that voted for John James in the 2020 Michigan US Senate election.
Strongly agree
No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional
John James, as a constitutional conservative, would likely agree that banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional. He has not explicitly supported a ban on Muslim immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries
John James has expressed the need for strong national security and effective immigration policies. He might agree with the idea of banning immigrants from 'high risk' countries, but he has not explicitly stated this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
John James has not explicitly supported a ban on Muslim immigrants. He has, however, emphasized the need for strong national security and effective immigration policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process
While John James has expressed concerns about national security and the need for effective immigration policies, he has not advocated for a complete ban on all immigration. His stance is more nuanced and focused on improving existing systems. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
While John James has expressed concerns about national security, he has not explicitly advocated for a blanket ban on Muslim immigrants. His stance is more nuanced, focusing on improving immigration policies and procedures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease
John James has not advocated for a ban on Muslim immigrants until terrorist attacks decrease. His focus is more on improving immigration policies and procedures, rather than implementing blanket bans. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 1hr ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 16,006 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here