Ron Paul

Very strongly agree

No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional

Paul has been a strong advocate for the Constitution and individual liberties, which includes freedom of religion. He would likely strongly agree that banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Paul has generally been supportive of immigration, arguing that the focus should be on improving the immigration system rather than banning specific groups. He has also been critical of policies that infringe on civil liberties, which would include a ban on Muslim immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries

While Paul has argued for improving the immigration system, he has not specifically advocated for banning immigrants from 'high risk' countries. His focus has been more on individual liberties and non-discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process

While Paul has argued for improving the immigration system, he has not advocated for a complete ban on all immigration. He has generally been supportive of immigration and has argued that the focus should be on improving the system rather than banning specific groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Ron Paul has consistently advocated for individual liberties and non-discrimination. He has not supported policies that single out specific religious or ethnic groups for immigration restrictions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease

Paul has not supported policies that single out specific religious or ethnic groups for immigration restrictions, even in the context of terrorism. He has argued that such policies are not effective in preventing terrorism and infringe on civil liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.