Try the political quiz
+

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

2840 Replies

 @9F56K6ZLibertarian from Utah  answered…2yrs2Y

No, let the free market figure out the best solutions.

  @VulcanMan6  from Kansas  commented…2yrs2Y

 @9L4Z23BIndependent  from Pennsylvania  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, and it should expand beyond wind power and go to all clean and renewable energy sources, including nuclear. Subsidies and tax credits should be targeted and be compared to benchmarks such as lower utility costs, reducing manufacturing costs, creating permanent jobs, etc. And if benchmarks aren't met, subsidies should be clawed back

 @9SH6X73 from North Carolina  answered…1yr1Y

No, wind power is by far the worst green energy solution compared to nuclear, geothermal, solar, and hydro. It costs more than it is worth

 @9L4Z23BIndependent  from Pennsylvania  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, the government should expand grants, loans, and tax credits to help support renewable and clean energy projects for the grid

 @9MS62CQLibertarian from Wisconsin  answered…1yr1Y

Wind power has a lot of regulations in place & is less effective than solar power. Responsibility is on the property owners & long term effect on wildlife is less than optimal. In lesser populated areas, it can be useful but kind of defeats the purpose. Migratory patterns need to be recognized. Vibrations & shadows need to be taken into account. Overall wind power is OK but solar is superior

 @9KC893XLibertarian from Virgin Islands  answered…2yrs2Y

No. The amount of energy produced by wind farming is not worth the cost of damage caused by building and maintaining wind farms.

 @9HS4B5GLibertarian  from Michigan  answered…2yrs2Y

Not at the expense of all other forms of energy. We should not be eliminating fossil fuels except to make them cleaner— fossil fuels can be eliminated only when our grid is able to handle the extra load and when the replacement is truly viable.

 @9GSFCSQLibertarian from Missouri  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but slowly reduce the credits as technology improves to ensure the private industry transitions to profitability through competition instead of subsidies.

 @9GG8DJ8Libertarian from Rhode Island  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but with limits in regards to damaging the environment for land and wildlife. Government should incentivize the wind power industry to reduce impacts on the environment.

 @9FKBPGN from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but hydro and solar should have significantly more investment over wind

 @9DQ68DZ from Kansas  answered…2yrs2Y

No, the government shouldn’t offer tax credits to anything for any reason.

 @9D9NVVB from Maryland  answered…2yrs2Y

No, the subsidies should be for R&D of all alternative energies. Not limited to wind power.

 @9D4ZMSQLibertarian from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

No, wind is the least reliable source of energy. We should focus our energy industry on transitioning to nuclear power. Until that is cost efficient, we should continue to use fossil fuels as our primary source of energy.

 @twocowsLibertarian  from Michigan  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9CWYV5JLibertarian from Utah  answered…2yrs2Y

No, not unless they can prove that they are more economical and safer than other forms of energy.

 @9CQJ7MSLibertarian from Illinois  answered…2yrs2Y

 @84ZWD6LLibertarian from Pennsylvania  answered…2yrs2Y

No, end tax credits and subsidies, but provide R&D grants to spur innovation to help the transition

 @97L8RCLLibertarian from North Carolina  answered…3yrs3Y

 @84ZWD6LLibertarian from Pennsylvania  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, end all current credits and subsidies to the fossil fuel industry and redirect it to the clean and renewable energy industry, and establish a carbon tax to fund additional subsidies for R&D

 @96M2VCXLibertarian from Kansas  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, alongside solar, hydroelectric, geothermal and nuclear power sources.

 @9635NPRLibertarian from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

Wind power needs more proof of effectiveness before subsidies are provided.

 @956G4DH from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

The government should give tax credits to the wind power industry but not subsidies.

 @9446422Libertarian from Michigan  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, the government should support more sustainable energy technologies including nuclear power.

 @93Z87SFLibertarianfrom Guam  answered…3yrs3Y

Нет это должны решать штаты а не конгресс

 @93K9QPRLibertarian from Virginia  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes but they should still keep ways of helping oil companies to keep jobs alive

 @93J3S38 from Pennsylvania  answered…3yrs3Y

 @JasenmaseLibertarian from Minnesota  answered…3yrs3Y

No, and the government should only support nuclear and hydroelectric power

 @93FVRVQLibertarianfrom Maine  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, until a more efficient energy source is implanted, as it is not efficient enough to replace fossil fuels

 @93FVRVQLibertarianfrom Maine  answered…3yrs3Y

 @939BFHTLibertarian from Kansas  answered…3yrs3Y

No, if the industry is unable to sustain itself then it is not worth the energy output.

 @8XZZ8YTLibertarianfrom Maine  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only in accordance with the individual turbines' environmental sustainability.

 @92YFYG9Libertarian from New Mexico  answered…3yrs3Y

No, Nuclear is a far lower emission sustainable energy source - and both are better than coal and oil.

 @GeebusHWChrist from Maryland  answered…3yrs3Y

 @92HKV5KLibertarian from Nebraska  answered…3yrs3Y

No, Wind Powered Turbines can kill flying avians (Eagles, Falcons, and other birds) and the turbine's power will only work with wind

 @9292W3FLibertarian from Virginia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8ZMR3LHLibertarian from Georgia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8ZJCWK6Libertarian from Colorado  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8Y6JS3R from Oregon  answered…4yrs4Y

No, wind power is not a sufficient alternative to cover the energy loss from shutting down coal, oil, and gas plants, nuclear power is statistically safer and far more efficient.

 @8Y3L4FNLibertarian from Louisiana  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but this should include all forms of alternative energy with a priority put on Nuclear.

 @8XX962KLibertarian from Georgia  answered…4yrs4Y

No, wind power has been shown to be extremely environmentally harmful, both in production of turbines and harm to avian creatures

 @8XQ64WP from Michigan  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but not cause it is green, but to help develop it in ways it can truly add to our energy indapendence.

 @8XLRSPT from Illinois  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8XB2BZ3Libertarian from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8WY8N57Libertarian from Indiana  answered…4yrs4Y

No, abolish all taxes but companies should be given incentives to use wind power.

 @8WNT76FLibertarian from Kentucky  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8WFB5S4Libertarian from New Jersey  answered…4yrs4Y

No, incentives should be given to nuclear power and efforts to improve energy storage technology for renewables

 @8W5KMNBLibertarian from New Mexico  answered…4yrs4Y

No, stop using the tax system to do this. Congress should appropriate a program to directly subsidize this but the true costs should be shown to the user before the government subsidy

 @8W3L5XL from Illinois  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8VFPHLVLibertarian from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8V65C8ZLibertarian from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8TX6C3LLibertarian from California  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but subsidies should be less than more efficient sustainable energy sources.

 @8TLDMVPLibertarian from Ohio  answered…4yrs4Y

No, wind power is only slightly better than oil and coal, and is definitely inferior to nuclear power, because the turbines produce lots of waste once they stop working and need to be discarded

 @8T9LX5MLibertarian from Missouri  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8SYX5MPLibertarian from Kansas  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8SXS8Z9Libertarian from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8SWBGXGLibertarian from Washington  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes to solar and geothermal as well as thorium based energy. Not wind, it's also bad!

 @8SJ6XCZLibertarian from Missouri  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8SD8YFX from North Carolina  answered…4yrs4Y

No. The government should give more tax credits to nuclear power industries and fusion power researchers.

 @8S5FD43Libertarian from Washington  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8S55CD6Libertarian from Missouri  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8S4B9SHLibertarian from California  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8S3WV75Libertarian from Missouri  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8S369C6Libertarian from California  answered…5yrs5Y

No, wind power is only useful in certain locations, such as on mountains/hills and oceans, otherwise they take up too much real estate

 @8S2T4R9Libertarian from Indiana  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but only when the wind power industry makes up 10% or more of our energy usage

 @8RZMPNDLibertarian from Missouri  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8RVHZPF from Illinois  answered…5yrs5Y

I believe wind power has its place, BUT should only be part of a diverse source. i dont believe in fooling the public that electric or battery power will not come at the cost of being more reliant on the government to provide. ie where does the energy source come from providing electric? i believe that answer is coal, currently. So, to think that electric powered vehicles will be self sustaining is a ridiculous notion. maybe work towards utilizing our natural gas sourcing that is abundant in this country and make this clean and safe to mine and to burn. this is the best out of the top three over coal and oil. i believe that electric is becoming more of a hype that is backed by the industry that only serves the need for them to have more power and money and thus are lobbying the government to say this is "good" for the country.

 @8RS652G from Missouri  answered…5yrs5Y

No, but offer more tax breaks for companies that produce more renewable energy.

 @8RKZHZ9 from Florida  answered…5yrs5Y

No, because wind power still relies heavily on fossil fuels to function. It is not a green industry

 @8RCNY3WLibertarian from Virginia  answered…5yrs5Y

No subsidies should be given to any industry. Let a free market decide who's winners and losers.

 @8QZTCGGLibertarian from Missouri  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8QYY5MYLibertarian from Missouri  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8QV9VRQ from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8QTGS2H from Tennessee  answered…5yrs5Y

No, wind energy can have adverse environmental impacts, including the potential to reduce, fragment, or degrade habitat for wildlife, fish, and plants. Furthermore, spinning turbine blades can pose a threat to flying wildlife like birds and bats.

 @8QLX6KFLibertarian from Missouri  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8QLS35JLibertarian from Missouri  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8QLFK8NLibertarian from Missouri  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8QKRDJH from Missouri  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8Q996GV from Missouri  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but not until wind power is proven to be as effective as coal and natural gas.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...