Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

1760 Replies

 @9L4Z23BIndependent  from Pennsylvania  answered…3mos3MO

Yes, update limits to $500 to federal candidates, $750 to PACs, $1000 to State or Local committees, and $1500 to a national party per election cycle. Ban Super PACs

 @9CCDFLZLibertarian  from California  answered…12mos12MO

Any Candidate's source of income should be from them and their Orthodox supporters alone. Any outside influence and institution should be disbarred from influencing a Candidates and their associates private agenda.

 @9W4SPVJLibertarian from Minnesota  answered…12mos12MO

No, but all donations should go to an equal access fund that splits donations evenly between major candidates.

 @9PYHTRXLibertarian from Michigan  answered…1yr1Y

No, but only if we repeal the 17th amendment that way only Congress can be bought, instead of both the Senate and Congress.

 @9J65GLB from Arkansas  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, and also publicly fund elections to supplement but not entirely ban individuals from donating up to a set monetary threshold.

 @9J24H3WLibertarian  from Colorado  answered…2yrs2Y

No but donations should be placed anonymously and dispersed evenly to avoid the persuasion of votes by politicians

 @9D4ZMSQLibertarian from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

No, but the candidate must be able to provide complete transparency to the money's origin. The Federal government should criminalize any and all contributions to candidates that come from donors who have ties to foreign nations and major foreign companies.

 @9D42W6HLibertarian from Colorado  answered…2yrs2Y

Political donations should be taxed and devided equally between all candidates

 @84ZWD6LLibertarian from Pennsylvania  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, $1,000 a year to individual candidates & $1,500 to Political Parties, and ban PACs and Super PACs. All donations should be public information, as well as how donations are spent

 @vshenkoLibertarianfrom New Jersey  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but only if a constitutional amendment is passed to ban such donations

 @9L4Z23BIndependent  from Pennsylvania  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, update limits to $750 to federal candidates, $1000 to PACs, $1500 to a national party per election cycle. Ban Super PACs

 @Brandonnoe84Libertarian  from Colorado  answered…3mos3MO

Yes, ban all political donations, publicly fund elections, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors.

 @9L4Z23BIndependent  from Pennsylvania  answered…3mos3MO

Yes, update limits to $5750 to federal candidates, $1000 to PACs, $1500 to a national party per election cycle. Ban Super PACs

 @9L4Z23BIndependent  from Pennsylvania  answered…11mos11MO

Yes, update limits to $1000 to federal candidates, $1500 to PACs, $2000 to State or Local committees, and $2500 to a national party per election cycle. Ban Super PACs

 @9T4RWHZLibertarian from Oklahoma  answered…1yr1Y

Yes and we need to get rid of pacs especially pacs that lobby in the intrest of foreign countries. Political donations should only come from private citizens.

 @9L4Z23BIndependent  from Pennsylvania  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, update limits to $1000 per election cycle to federal candidates, $1500 to PACs and Super PACs, $2000 to State or Local committees, and $2500 to a national party

 @8B2FF82Libertarian  from Minnesota  answered…2yrs2Y

No - but no candidate should accept donations from a person no residing in their area. So, people in New York, for instance, can NOT donate to candidates in Minnesota.

 @9JZ6N38Libertarian from Colorado  answered…2yrs2Y

yes there should be a limit and any and all donations need to be traced to the original provider, no more hiding behind a super pac or other loopholes

 @8HZ2CS7Libertarian from Georgia  answered…5yrs5Y

No, and political campaigns should be government funded, equally amongst all parties

 @93HRXV4Libertarian from Florida  answered…2yrs2Y

On the "individual level" no but organizations such as corporations and unions should not be allowed to donate anything. Neither is a person in that sense

 @9BN2G7PLibertarian from New Jersey  answered…2yrs2Y

yes, and political commercials should be banned, and medias should give access to all candidates proportionally, and the 2 paryu system should be abolish

 @96PJKHGLibertarian from Ohio  answered…3yrs3Y

No, a voluntarily donating individual should be able to donate all one wants for as long as there is not a quid pro quo

 @84ZWD6LLibertarian from Pennsylvania  answered…3yrs3Y

 @966M8HL from Minnesota  answered…3yrs3Y

lobbying is not good and these companies are practically buying these people, their donations are not donations they are exchanges. When these people get into office they need to pay these people back with protection and policies. However I do not want to control where and how people's money is used.

 @93YY23G from Arizona  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, with a maximum of $100 given by any person person per election cycle.

 @93TCX2B from California  answered…3yrs3Y

 @LobbyLoitererfrom Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

 @93FSHQN from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

If from a corporation - yes. Corporations should not have any free speech protections. If from individuals that rightfully have freedom of speech protections, no.

 @93CP2FRLibertarian from California  answered…3yrs3Y

YES, and all donations should be public knowledge. Politicians should become politicians because they want to help their communities and their country, not to make money by being sponsored or bought.

  @AndyMaidment from Missouri  answered…4yrs4Y

No. All donations should be public and should only be allowed to come from constituents and family members.

 @8YWD8TW from Florida  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but corporations, special interests groups, and their owners/members should be banned from making political donations, with all donations being public knowledge.

 @8XVH3Z4 from North Carolina  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8X2NTLC from Kentucky  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8WYNLXQLibertarian from Massachusetts  answered…4yrs4Y

Donations kept anonymous to the candidate but reported to a fair election committee should be allowed in any amount.

 @8WXMM3JLibertarian from Georgia  answered…4yrs4Y

Do too s should only be allowed from individuals... No corporation, business, non- profit or union. They cannot properly speak for all their members or employees.

 @8WJJ5WHLibertarian from California  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8WDYSMDIndependent from Massachusetts  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8VHQ5RZ from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8VFPHLVLibertarian from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but only if all donations are made directly and publicly through accounts brokered and administered at the Department of the Treasury, so rejection of foreign money is a default and not an accounting error.

 @8V8XG5XLibertarian from North Carolina  answered…4yrs4Y

No, have it so the public knows who a politician gets their donations from, there would be ways for a large donor to get around donation limits

 @8TLDMVPLibertarian from Ohio  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but any donation above $500,000 should be required to be released for public knowledge of the name and occupation of the donor

 @7H3BMPPLibertarian from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8T3NY8RLibertarian from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but all donations to candidates should be anonymous, to help prevent corruption.

 @8SPPZYZLibertarianfrom Maine  answered…4yrs4Y

Ban all lobbying, but allow donations to candidates that couldn't run otherwise.

 @8RVHZPF from Illinois  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, and ban all, negative ads against the opposing party. if there are ads, they should be only promote the candidate and their offerings. Ban all PAC definitely SUPERPAC donations. The government should allow all candidates equal opportunity of media exposure on TV broadcast stations. mail solicitation should be banned. too must waste.

 @8R4RLTM from Virginia  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8Q96L39Libertarian from Kentucky  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes . And only permit donations from legal INDIVIDUAL citizens who reside in the candidates district . No Party money , no PACS , no Corporate donors . All donations MUST be disclosed with the donors identity .

 @8Q8PLCRLibertarian from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8P6537RLibertarianfrom Washington  answered…5yrs5Y

Not from Individuals who can vote for the Candidate, nothing from organizational or incorporated groups, businesses, and unions.

 @8NM2LKPLibertarian from Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, and there should be limits placed on the amount of money candidates can expend during a campaign

 @8N6PJNVLibertarian from Michigan  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, and only citizens can donate not companies, organizations, or foreigners.

 @8LVV4FMLibertarian from Tennessee  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8LMJ7HYLibertarian from California  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes and this should include disclosure of all Super Pac donations and the Super Pacs should have to disclose full information.

 @8JFQFPQLibertarian from Ohio  answered…5yrs5Y

Individual donations— no, corporate donations/ “foundations”/ and foreign government donations—YES

 @8JCXJGRLibertarian from California  answered…5yrs5Y

Put all donations into a pot to be distributed amongst political candidates.

 @7JTXZF3Republican from Pennsylvania  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8FRHRNQ from Maryland  answered…5yrs5Y

No, but they should be expected to state the names and affiliations of all of their donors.

 @8FG37GNLibertarian from Colorado  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but only donations from corporations; individual donations should be allowed.

 @8F2DWQY from South Carolina  answered…5yrs5Y

No, money is property and this is would be a violation of property rights.

 @8DMRHBGLibertarian from Florida  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8CPY6JXLibertarian from California  answered…5yrs5Y

We should implement $100 Democracy Dollars to each citizen for their use in donating to the candidates of their choice.

 @8CMPJ3XLibertarian from Arizona  answered…5yrs5Y

no limit on amount a donor can donate and they can choose to donate any amount they choose however if information is requested by the public or legal system, its should be available to show and not hidden/secret.

 @8CBT6RK from Virginia  answered…5yrs5Y

 @9CJSMWRLibertarian from California  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but prohibiting political parties entirely would be a better solution.

 @9B3Y369 from Hawaii  answered…3yrs3Y

All donor money should go into a pot that is distributed to all candidate equally. No limit on personal money, except that the amount most be recorded, verified, and public

 @4XN47N8Libertariananswered…3yrs3Y

No, any donor should be allowed to donate as much as they want, for as long as they want, as long as there is not a quid pro quo

 @97ZYCSF from South Carolina  answered…3yrs3Y

 @84ZWD6LLibertarian from Pennsylvania  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, $1,000 a year to individual candidates & $1,500 to Political Parties, and ban PACs and Super PACs. All donations should be public information

 @84ZWD6LLibertarian from Pennsylvania  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8TFGQK6 from Iowa  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes. All candidates should also have a max amount of money that can be used when running.

 @8NXN4K6Libertarian from Florida  answered…5yrs5Y

No, if donors want to provide an amount to a candidate - that is of their own free will and there is nothing wrong with that.

 @8MYHQMYLibertarian from Alabama  answered…5yrs5Y

No, as long as the candidate does not know where the contribution is coming from

 @8GT95F5Libertarian from Michigan  answered…5yrs5Y

  @realmichaeljlongLibertarian from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

The amount of money politions recive from doners should also be allowed for politoical 3d parties as well hence what we need that will address this is something commonly referd to as campagin finnace reform which will address this .

 @97KXPTZLibertarian from California  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, all donations should be illegal but the Government should pay for the camping. The campaigns should be very simple. Like an infomercial that everyone should see. We see what the person is planning on doing and vote based on that. It needs to be fare for the rich and the poor.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...